Closed nichtich closed 5 years ago
This makes a lot of sense. How should the source be displayed?
Also, there might be issues related to truncating the results, see #151.
Another question: What does "same mapping" mean in this case? Same mapping content identifier, i.e. same members and type?
Mappings with same mapping content identifier could be merged (creator is repeatable) but date and uri cannot be merged so maybe only merge in the display, not internally?
Does this still apply? With the new provider system, I think it would be confusing to merge them. Also, showing information about a single mapping (#201) wouldn't make much sense (or we would need tabs for each source when showing the info).
Does not fully make sense with the new provider system, so closing this.
See for instance this example and click on "save and edit" one of the highlighted mappings (DDC 512.482 -> RVK SK 340). This mapping then occurs three times. We could combine these three rows with the differing sources combined.