Closed nichtich closed 6 years ago
ISO 25964 has precoordination, so maybe it's better to map to that? Currently you use:
"fromScheme": "void:subjectsTarget",
"toScheme": "void:objectsTarget",
"memberChoice": {
"@id": "rdfs:member",
"@container": "@list"
Precoordinated concepts would not use fromScheme
/targetScheme
but memberSet
/memberList
. I don't know how ISO 25964 in RDF handles compound concepts, there have been several suggestions, e.g http://purl.org/iso25964/skos-thes#CompoundEquivalence. A better RDF-property than rdfs:member
is needed. The members of a precoordinated concept are kind of skos:broader
to the more specific concept but it's a different relationship.
I added support of composed concept in 0.2.1 and summarized remaining questions to #61.
A concept can also be a concept bundle: