We should have a 'develop' branch for active development by the community.

gcentral / top-level-launcher

MIT License

0 stars 2 forks source link

We should have a 'develop' branch for active development by the community. #3

Open CaseyZS opened 1 week ago

chrisb2244 commented 1 week ago

To help someone who didn't join the mob session understand - is the suggestion here to make it possible for anyone to push to a develop branch, or to split development from specific packaging/build steps more forcefully than just with tags? (Or to build two types, in a 'nightly' vs stable type arrangement?)

(i.e. why is developing in forked repos and opening PRs against main not the preferred choice?)

CaseyZS commented 1 week ago

I was thinking in more of a gitflow paradigm where 'main' is reserved for updates/merges that are available for release vs 'develop' can have new features merged in that aren't yet built into a VIP.