Better tests allow for better code. Property-based testing allows our tests to be a more accurate specification for the program behaviour/intent. In an ideal world, this would allow us to precisely specify all code behaviour with a reduced set of more comprehensive tests.
Is there an alternative you've considered?
It may be possible to avoid the use of Hypothesis.
Additional context
Converting the tests to utilise Hypothesis will take a lot of time. This is a forward looking change that will pay future dividends, by reducing the number of edge-case bugs (not caught by existing tests) and more precisely defining program intent.
bk958178
commented
1 month ago
What's the new feature?
Use Hypothesis for property-based testing.
See the Hypothesis docs for further information https://hypothesis.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
What value does this add?
Better tests allow for better code. Property-based testing allows our tests to be a more accurate specification for the program behaviour/intent. In an ideal world, this would allow us to precisely specify all code behaviour with a reduced set of more comprehensive tests.
Is there an alternative you've considered?
It may be possible to avoid the use of Hypothesis.
Additional context
Converting the tests to utilise Hypothesis will take a lot of time. This is a forward looking change that will pay future dividends, by reducing the number of edge-case bugs (not caught by existing tests) and more precisely defining program intent.