gco / rubyripper

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/rubyripper
0 stars 0 forks source link

Normalize and WaveGain no longer in Ubuntu repos #484

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Ubuntu no longer supports normalize or wavegain, instead they have a 
(relatively) new package called "normalize-audio" which contains three 
commands: normalize-audio, which normalizes waves; normalize-ogg, which 
normalizes oggs; and normalize-mp3, which normalizes mp3s. You might perhaps 
look into support for those at some point.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jlfento...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2011 at 8:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Err - the New issue form doesn't let me set the type or priority. This should 
be an enhancement and low priority.

Original comment by jlfento...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2011 at 8:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by boukewou...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2011 at 10:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
this isn't all that new, Debian changed the name some time ago. for the moment 
users can just link as they see fit 
Ex.
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/normalize-audio /usr/local/bin/normalize

Original comment by mc631...@gmail.com on 29 Nov 2011 at 4:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
For the moment, yes, but for the long run, adding support for the "new" 
commands is a feature to consider. That why I mentioned it - not "for the 
moment," but for later.

Original comment by jlfento...@gmail.com on 29 Nov 2011 at 11:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
"New" package? normalize-audio is available since (at least) Ubuntu Hardy 8.04, 
so it's there for more than 4 years. Last upstream version is from 2005

Original comment by rodrigo....@gmail.com on 2 Oct 2012 at 5:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Fixed with commit:
http://code.google.com/p/rubyripper/source/detail?r=5f7c54e2856607d852d290eee7d0
96132c908b65

Based on the comments here I just replace the binary name, I expect the 
arguments to be the same.

Original comment by boukewou...@gmail.com on 9 Jan 2013 at 8:31