Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Sorry, I'm porting PyV8 to Python 3.x, and I will fix it later
Original comment by flier...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 2:40
That's perfectly ok with me. Just testing the new changes in order to help you
some way... :)
Thanks again for your great work.
Original comment by angelo.d...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 2:46
Thanks, I'm not familiar with Python 3.x, so, sometimes we need rollback some
code :(
Original comment by flier...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 2:51
A quick update. Seems like problems exist even in -r479. No problems at all in
-r478.
Original comment by angelo.d...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 4:37
Just a quick fix to avoid the segmentation fault, please verify it with SVN
trunk code after r494
Original comment by flier...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2013 at 4:13
Unfortunately it seems like the patch didn't fix the issue
buffer@saiph ~/pyv8 $ python PyV8.py -v
2013-02-05 09:37:54,016 INFO testing PyV8 module 1.0 with V8 v3.16.13
testBlock (__main__.TestAST) ... ok
testCallStatements (__main__.TestAST) ... ok
testForStatement (__main__.TestAST) ... ok
testIfStatement (__main__.TestAST) ... ok
testLiterals (__main__.TestAST) ... ok
testOperations (__main__.TestAST) ... ok
testSwitchStatement (__main__.TestAST) ... ok
testTryStatements (__main__.TestAST) ... ok
testMultiNamespace (__main__.TestContext) ... ok
testEventDispatch (__main__.TestDebug) ... 2013-02-05 09:37:54,039 DEBUG
receive debug event: before compile script: <script script @ 0:0> : 'function
test() { text = "1+2"; return eval(text) } test()'
2013-02-05 09:37:54,042 DEBUG receive debug event: after compile script:
<script script @ 0:0> : 'function test() { text = "1+2"; return eval(text) }
test()'
2013-02-05 09:37:54,046 DEBUG receive debug event: before compile script:
<script script None @ 0:0> : '1+2'
#00 test() [unnamed] line 1 column 45 (position 45)#01 [anonymous]() [unnamed]
line 1 column 53 (position 53)
2013-02-05 09:37:54,049 DEBUG receive debug event: after compile script:
<script script None @ 0:0> : '1+2'
#00 test() [unnamed] line 1 column 45 (position 45)#01 [anonymous]() [unnamed]
line 1 column 53 (position 53)
ok
testClassProperties (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testCompile (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testEval (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testExtension (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testGlobal (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testNativeExtension (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testObjectBuildInMethods (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testPrecompile (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testPythonWrapper (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testThis (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testUnicodeSource (__main__.TestEngine) ... ok
testLocker (__main__.TestMultithread) ... ok
testMultiJavascriptThread (__main__.TestMultithread) ... ok
testMultiPythonThread (__main__.TestMultithread) ... ok
testArray (__main__.TestWrapper) ... ok
testAutoConverter (__main__.TestWrapper) ... ok
testCall (__main__.TestWrapper) ... ok
testClassicStyleObject (__main__.TestWrapper) ... ok
testConstructor (__main__.TestWrapper) ... ok
testDate (__main__.TestWrapper) ... ok
testDestructor (__main__.TestWrapper) ... Segmentation fault
buffer@saiph ~/thug/src $ python thug.py -l testHTMLTableElement.html
Segmentation fault
buffer@saiph ~/thug/src $ gdb python
GNU gdb (Gentoo 7.5 p1) 7.5
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://bugs.gentoo.org/>...
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/python...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) r thug.py -l testHTMLTableElement.html
Starting program: /usr/bin/python thug.py -l testHTMLTableElement.html
warning: Could not load shared library symbols for linux-vdso.so.1.
Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"?
process 21075 is executing new program: /usr/bin/python2.7
warning: Could not load shared library symbols for linux-vdso.so.1.
Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"?
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
[New Thread 0x7ffff7ff2700 (LWP 21078)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007fffeff565ac in boost::python::api::object_base::ptr() const () from
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
(gdb) info stack
#0 0x00007fffeff565ac in boost::python::api::object_base::ptr() const () from
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#1 0x00007fffeffbf9ae in ObjectTracer::~ObjectTracer() () from
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#2 0x00007fffeffc3cb1 in std::auto_ptr<ObjectTracer>::~auto_ptr() () from
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#3 0x00007fffeffbfc4c in ObjectTracer::WeakCallback(v8::Persistent<v8::Value>,
void*) () from
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#4 0x00007ffff0115922 in
v8::internal::GlobalHandles::PostGarbageCollectionProcessing(v8::internal::Garba
geCollector, v8::internal::GCTracer*) () from
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#5 0x00007ffff01385c5 in
v8::internal::Heap::PerformGarbageCollection(v8::internal::GarbageCollector,
v8::internal::GCTracer*) () from
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#6 0x00007ffff0138da2 in
v8::internal::Heap::CollectGarbage(v8::internal::AllocationSpace,
v8::internal::GarbageCollector, char const*, char const*) () from
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#7 0x00007ffff013926b in v8::internal::Heap::CollectAllGarbage(int, char
const*) () from
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#8 0x00007fffeff866d1 in CEngine::CollectAllGarbage(bool) () from
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#9 0x00007fffeffaba16 in _object* boost::python::detail::invoke<int, void
(*)(bool), boost::python::arg_from_python<bool>
>(boost::python::detail::invoke_tag_<true, false>, int const&, void (*&)(bool),
boost::python::arg_from_python<bool>&) ()
from /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#10 0x00007fffeffa7da4 in boost::python::detail::caller_arity<1u>::impl<void
(*)(bool), boost::python::default_call_policies, boost::mpl::vector2<void,
bool> >::operator()(_object*, _object*) ()
from /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#11 0x00007fffeffa2fdf in
boost::python::objects::caller_py_function_impl<boost::python::detail::caller<vo
id (*)(bool), boost::python::default_call_policies, boost::mpl::vector2<void,
bool> > >::operator()(_object*, _object*) ()
from /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/PyV8-1.0_dev-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/_PyV8.so
#12 0x00007fffef6e879f in boost::python::objects::function::call(_object*,
_object*) const () from /usr/lib64/libboost_python-2.7.so.1.52.0
[..]
Original comment by angelo.d...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2013 at 8:39
I have refactor the living mapping after r496, please verify the issue with
latest SVN trunk code, thanks
Original comment by flier...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2013 at 12:10
Seems like the segfault disappeared but I'm seeing a huge regression in
performances. I attached just an example but can reproduce it with almost every
Thug test case.
SVN -498
buffer@saiph ~/thug/src $ time python thug.py -l
../samples/misc/PluginDetect-0.7.9.html
real 0m23.259s
user 0m23.088s
sys 0m0.152s
SVN -r478
buffer@saiph ~/thug/src $ time python thug.py -l
../samples/misc/PluginDetect-0.7.9.html
real 0m1.741s
user 0m1.651s
sys 0m0.059s
Original comment by angelo.d...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2013 at 1:07
ok, it seems the object tracer introduce some efforts, maybe you could submit a
new issue, and I will follow up it tomorrow :) thanks
Original comment by flier...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2013 at 1:11
Ok will do. Thanks
Original comment by angelo.d...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2013 at 1:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
angelo.d...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 2:34