[BREAKING] Transition from Tapir to Mooncake

[gdalle]

[!WARNING] Breaking change: AutoTapir is no longer supported, replaced by AutoMooncake (see https://github.com/SciML/ADTypes.jl/pull/89)

DI deps

• [x] Replace Tapir with Mooncake, bump ADTypes compat

DI extensions, tests, CI

• [x] Rename everything from Tapir to Mooncake
• [x] Handle new Mooncake.Config (ping @willtebbutt)
• [x] Implement multi-argument support
• [x] Reactivate other tests

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 89.87342% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 98.43%. Comparing base (987ca87) to head (a95cd2e). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../ext/DifferentiationInterfaceMooncakeExt/onearg.jl	75.00%	8 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #500 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 98.45% 98.43% -0.02% ========================================== Files 106 106 Lines 4452 4471 +19 ========================================== + Hits 4383 4401 +18 - Misses 69 70 +1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/gdalle/DifferentiationInterface.jl/pull/500/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Guillaume+Dalle) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [DI](https://app.codecov.io/gh/gdalle/DifferentiationInterface.jl/pull/500/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Guillaume+Dalle) | `98.48% <89.87%> (-0.03%)` | :arrow_down: | | [DIT](https://app.codecov.io/gh/gdalle/DifferentiationInterface.jl/pull/500/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Guillaume+Dalle) | `98.31% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Guillaume+Dalle#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[gdalle]

I think multi-argument support is operational, care to take a look? All you need to know is that:

• contexts can contain any number of arguments (including 0), wrapped in specific types like Constant <: Context
• one can access the actual data with unwrap, e.g. unwrap(Constant(c)) == c