I am finding this section really hard to understand. I feel like it is either:
About curated calendars, in which case I would expect it to tell me what a curated calendar is and why I would want one - currently this is unexplained terminology
A case study of the Trans Dimension specifically
As it currently sits I feel like it's doing neither well. As the second thing you see on the home page I find it very confusing. Why is this information here? How does it relate to PlaceCal? Why should I care?
If it was option 1, the content would explain the terminology, show what was possible, and explain why it matters.
If it was option 2, I think it needs to give the meta explanation of the project - who we worked with and what the goal was.
Suggested fixes
For option 1 - i think it needs a total rewrite as it's not selling curated calendars to me atm
For option 2 - i would redo as following:
Change title to "Case study: The Trans Dimension" or "How PlaceCal helped the trans community in London"
Move the description which is currently at the bottom to the top - currently im scrolling past loads of content not knowing why its there
Only show the logo or header image not both - this looks cluttered to me
Change quote to the one below (or a part of it)
“I am delighted to see the advent of The Trans Dimension. It’s just what the trans community needs. As an organiser of a trans meetup group myself I couldn’t believe how many events were happening each week, most of which I’d never heard of before. This is a great resource and a super way to stay up to date. I can’t wait to see how this evolves in the future.”
Ray Lavery, London Transgender Meetup
Commenting on this based on this state:
Acceptance criteria (TBC)
[ ] The block's function is clearly defined
[ ] The content is in an order that makes sense for that function
What's the issue?
I am finding this section really hard to understand. I feel like it is either:
As it currently sits I feel like it's doing neither well. As the second thing you see on the home page I find it very confusing. Why is this information here? How does it relate to PlaceCal? Why should I care?
If it was option 1, the content would explain the terminology, show what was possible, and explain why it matters.
If it was option 2, I think it needs to give the meta explanation of the project - who we worked with and what the goal was.
Suggested fixes
For option 1 - i think it needs a total rewrite as it's not selling curated calendars to me atm
For option 2 - i would redo as following:
Commenting on this based on this state:
Acceptance criteria (TBC)
Implementation notes & questions
Implementation plan
To be written by the developer