Closed tommorris closed 13 years ago
I have no idea on all this stuff so as long as stallman is happy I am
cbetta: can I take that as a "so long as everyone else comes to a sane, consensual decision, I'll go with whatever"? ;-)
Yeah. Although I think my beer-license is still a viable option too.
On 27 September 2011 16:53, Tom Morris < reply@reply.github.com>wrote:
cbetta: can I take that as a "so long as everyone else comes to a sane, consensual decision, I'll go with whatever"? ;-)
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geeksoflondon/grid4rails/issues/76#issuecomment-2212463
Good with me too.
Beer sounds good. But AGPL also fine.
As long as I dont get a bill for laywers.
Sounds good here!
Sounds A-OK to me :)
Morena has sent me an email confirming she is okay with the AGPL.
I'll sort the licensing out shortly.
All done. We now have a license in the README and a LICENSE file containing the full text of the license.
When we started working on Griddy, we put off deciding on a license.
I'm going to suggest that we should go with the Affero General Public License v. 3.0. It is a free software license specifically designed for web apps. It is used by a variety of web apps including StatusNet, OTRS, CiviCRM, and many others.
The AGPL is functionally similar for web apps as the GPL is for desktop and server apps. Under the AGPL, others have all of Stallman's four freedoms, and have to share modifications made (like GPL does for desktop apps and Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike does for creative works like text and images).
If we can get consensus on using the AGPL, we can then modify the README and include a LICENSE.txt file.
If there isn't consensus on using the AGPL, we'll close this issue and decide on another license.
Any objections?