Closed jiarong closed 2 years ago
Hello, Can you show an example and share the sequence that lead to this ? Thanks
Thanks for quick response. I have an example and the sequence in the attached file. example.if2.txt
Hello,
running integron_finder --local-max example.if2.txt
Leads to :
ID_integron ID_replicon element pos_beg pos_end strand evalue type_elt annotation model type default distance_2attC considered_topology
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_2 1460 2782 -1 1.8e-25 protein intI intersection_tyr_intI complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_3 3019 3447 1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_001 3396 3522 1 9.2e-06 attC attC attc_4 complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_002 3933 4058 1 9.3e-07 attC attC attc_4 complete No 411.0 lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_4 3992 4570 -1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_003 4580 4705 1 9.6e-07 attC attC attc_4 complete No 522.0 lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_5 4633 5097 -1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_004 5133 5257 1 8.9e-09 attC attC attc_4 complete No 428.0 lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_6 5303 5671 1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_005 5682 5780 1 8.2e-06 attC attC attc_4 complete No 425.0 lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_7 5791 6246 1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_006 6263 6390 1 3.7e-05 attC attC attc_4 complete No 483.0 lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_8 6360 6782 1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_007 6790 6923 1 3.2e-07 attC attC attc_4 complete No 400.0 lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_9 6938 7285 1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_008 7234 7359 1 1.5e-07 attC attC attc_4 complete No 311.0 lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_10 7363 7692 1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_009 7700 7798 1 4.2e-06 attC attC attc_4 complete No 341.0 lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_11 7756 7968 -1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_12 8072 8329 -1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_010 8264 8362 1 1.3e-06 attC attC attc_4 complete No 466.0 lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1_13 8376 8807 1 NA protein protein NA complete No NA lin
integron_01 SS.fna.0_711E1DmetaG_2_FD_JGI_scaffold_3407_c1 attc_011 8809 8910 1 0.11 attC attC attc_4 complete No 447.0 lin
All attC are on the same strand and opposed to the intI's strand. Some CDS between two attC sites can be on the other strand, that's not a problem.
I see. It is normal to have gene cassette on the other strand. They just do NOT get benefit from the promoter Pc.
Hi, I noticed there are some gene cassettes of the same integron (complete) on different strands in Integron_Finder (v2.0.2) results. This should not happen, right? Thanks!