Closed Ales-ibt closed 5 months ago
Hello, can you check whether the branch fix_find_attc_max solves your pb ?
Hello!
Thank you for your quick response.
Using the branch fix_find_attc_max the pipeline is running Ok with contig_11, but still reporting negative coordinates for contig_116.
@jeanrjc Could you merge that fix into master and include to new release, please? We (MGnify) are using you tool in our pipeline that @Ales-ibt is supporting. We had to build a container from that branch and implement that fix into pipeline. It would be super cool if we can replace it with proper working release.
Thank you! Best, Kate MGnify developer
In addition, we are currently ignoring predictions with negative coordinates. It would be great to have that fix as well in the new release :D
fixed in 2.0.5 version
Hello there,
Thank you for developing IntegronFinder.
I am updating to version 2.0.3 to check if some issues related to negative coordinates and other bugs we have been experimenting with are solved. Unfortunately, we noted that negative coordinates are still reported (contig_116 in the attached example.fasta.gz). However, what I'd like to report here is an error we get with contig_11 in the same attached fasta file. The error with version 2.0.2 is the following:
And in version 2.0.3 it becomes into:
This is the command I am running in Linux:
Integron_Finder Version: integron_finder version 2.0.3 Using:
Python 3.12.2 (main, Feb 7 2024, 21:40:00) [GCC 12.2.0]
numpy 1.26.4
pandas 2.2.0
matplolib 3.8.2
biopython 1.83
Prodigal V2.6.3: February, 2016
INFERNAL 1.1.4 (Dec 2020)
HMMER 3.3.2 (Nov 2020); http://hmmer.org/
Thanks in advance!