Closed micheles closed 3 months ago
Here is performance.zip on my mini-pc:
# before | calc_31392, maxmem=15.0 GB | time_sec | memory_mb | counts | |----------------------------+----------+-----------+---------| | total classical | 9_245 | 78.1016 | 66 | | get_poes | 5_086 | 0.0 | 382_180 | | computing mean_std | 1_748 | 0.0 | 7_710 | | composing pnes | 1_592 | 0.0 | 382_180 | | ClassicalCalculator.run | 601.1 | 118.2188 | 1 | # after | calc_31390, maxmem=14.1 GB | time_sec | memory_mb | counts | |----------------------------+----------+-----------+---------| | total classical | 8_703 | 64.6309 | 66 | | get_poes | 4_859 | 0.0 | 359_960 | | computing mean_std | 1_564 | 0.0 | 14_434 | | composing pnes | 1_522 | 0.0 | 359_960 | | ClassicalCalculator.run | 569.2 | 113.0273 | 1 |
Incidentally, it is 32 seconds faster even if the number of calls to "computing mean_std" doubles. The number of calls to "get_poes" and "composing poes" decreases a bit.
Here is performance.zip on my mini-pc:
Incidentally, it is 32 seconds faster even if the number of calls to "computing mean_std" doubles. The number of calls to "get_poes" and "composing poes" decreases a bit.