This naming scheme gets closer to their actual width.
See the original comment thread bringing the naming issue up.
I left F2 untouched since the current name sounds like it's close enough to what we want.
id | short_name | slit_width | decker | long_name | obsolete
---------------+-----------------+------------+-----------+----------------------+----------
Pinhole | Pinhole | 0 | Imaging | 2-Pixel Pinhole Grid | f
SubPixPinhole | Sub-Pix Pinhole | 0 | Imaging | Sub-Pixel Pinhole Gr | f
LongSlit1 | Long Slit 1px | 1 | Long Slit | 1-Pixel Long Slit | f
LongSlit2 | Long Slit 2px | 2 | Long Slit | 2-Pixel Long Slit | f
LongSlit3 | Long Slit 3px | 3 | Long Slit | 3-Pixel Long Slit | f
LongSlit4 | Long Slit 4px | 4 | Long Slit | 4-Pixel Long Slit | f
LongSlit6 | Long Slit 6px | 6 | Long Slit | 6-Pixel Long Slit | f
LongSlit8 | Long Slit 8px | 8 | Long Slit | 8-Pixel Long Slit | f
This naming scheme gets closer to their actual width.
See the original comment thread bringing the naming issue up.
I left F2 untouched since the current name sounds like it's close enough to what we want.