Closed jiwonjoung closed 5 months ago
When we tried to profile noWorkflow, we faced the same issue =/ It was a while ago, and I don't quite remember what happened, but I think it was not a name collision issue. It was related to to using two profilers in Python (noWorkflow uses a profiler to collect execution provenance).
We couldn't fix it at the time and we implemented the following decorator to collect and save the durations: https://github.com/gems-uff/noworkflow/blob/master/capture/noworkflow/now/utils/metaprofiler.py
The new version of noWorkflow (branch 2.0-alpha) does not use a profiler to collect provenance, but it is still in development and may not work for many scripts
Closing the issue since it is related to noWorklow 1.0
Hello all -- I am interested in profiling noworkflow using a Python profiler like cProfile but there seems to be a name collision between some functions in cProfile and those in the noworkflow profiler. This breaks the profiler on noworkflow. I am interested in seeing which parts of noworkflow are consuming the most time.
Any tips on how to do this?