Split Codecov report into unit and integration tests.

[gendx]

Pull Request Overview

This pull request adds Codecov flags to separate coverage coming from unit tests vs. integration tests.

Testing Strategy

This pull request was tested by running the GitHub workflows.

Supporting Documentation and References

• https://docs.codecov.com/docs/flags
• https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action
• https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/8396

TODO or Help Wanted

N/A

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 86.83% // Head: 86.83% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (035097f) compared to base (adfba36). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #88 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 86.83% 86.83% ======================================= Files 19 19 Lines 2484 2484 ======================================= Hits 2157 2157 Misses 327 327 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | integration | `81.59% <ø> (?)` | | | unit | `54.50% <ø> (?)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.