geneontology / amigo

AmiGO is the public interface for the Gene Ontology.
http://amigo.geneontology.org
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
29 stars 17 forks source link

"Data health" link needs to be replaced or removed #565

Closed pgaudet closed 3 years ago

pgaudet commented 5 years ago

Hello,

The 'datahealth' icon on the AmiGO annotation pages goes to a 404 page on the website:

image

Thanks, Pascale

pgaudet commented 5 years ago

Can you please assign someone to this ?

kltm commented 5 years ago

@ukemi Okay, looking at this, it is a link to the old "form". Currently, we no long have a form (long-form anonymous text input in the browser). The immediate options are:

1) Remove data health tags; as far as I know these links have never been used anyways, so little loss 2) Turn it into a preloaded help at geneontology.org "mailto" link; easy, but may be a spam magnet 3) Turn it into a link to a GH data form, like https://github.com/geneontology/helpdesk/issues/new?assignees=&labels=&template=issue-report.md&title=Data+Narfed ; easy, but requires GH account.

I would suggest 3, then 1. 2 I believe will cause more churn than help.

This can be revisited once we get whatever comes next for the helpdesk setup.

pgaudet commented 5 years ago

We need to provide an easy way for users to contact the consortium from AmiGO. If this is not it, where would we put that link ?

Thanks, Pascale

ValWood commented 5 years ago

I agree, there should be a "contact" link on every consortium/amigo page. And it shouldn't say "data health"

ukemi commented 5 years ago

I agree. Doesn't it make most sense to just put the 'contact us' link on the pages similar to the way it is on the home page?

ukemi commented 5 years ago

For consistency, shouldn't the same footer go on all GOC pages?

kltm commented 5 years ago

Okay, some history for this is here: https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/365 . TL;DR: This was not meant to be a "contact us" thing from the beginning. There was some more off-tracker discussion on this, but it's not at hand.

I'm more than happy to get rid of it in favor of a more homepage-like footer. (The literal footer cannot be reused, but we can get something with similar information.)

@ukemi Ideally, there is not a lot of iteration on this. With #566 we'll already be kicking to something "functional". I would propose then:

Otherwise, if the changes cannot be explained in simple text here, could somebody put together a mock-up of what they want it to look like, including the additional versioning information.

pgaudet commented 3 years ago

Can this close?

kltm commented 3 years ago

Seems to work, no longer 404.