Closed pgaudet closed 6 years ago
@pgaudet Could you remind me if we made a decision about how to annotate ligands which bind to the receptor? Should we annotate them as regulator of "adenylate cyclase-activating G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway"? or should we annotate them to the pathway? Thanks!
Hi @sabrinatoro
The ligand is part of the pathway, so you would annotate to "adenylate cyclase-activating G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway" (not regulation of...)
Thanks, Pascale
Thank you, @pgaudet. The ZFIN annotations have all been updated.
Hi @pgaudet ,
I came across this very interesting case and I would like your opinion, please.
There were a few annotations of GO:0030819 ' positive regulation of cAMP biosynthetic process' to CALCRL in human (Q16602). This protein when pairing with different receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) can produce calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors (CRLR/RAMP1) and adrenomedullin (AM) receptors (CRLR/RAMP2 or -3). In PMID: 10882736, they show that when stably coexpressed with RAMPs, CRLR-GFP appeared on the cell surface and was fully active in intracellular cAMP production and calcium mobilization. This leads to CRLR endocytosis that occurred predominantly through a clathrin-dependent pathway. (http://www.jbc.org/content/275/38/29602.full.pdf)
Now there are specific terms for these pathways (see below) that I have used replaces the offending terms, but it seems that the information that these pathways modulate cAMP production is lost.
GO:1990410 Process adrenomedullin receptor signaling pathway GO:1990408 Process calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor signaling pathway
I have compare the 2 GO terms above with GO:0007189 'adenylate cyclase-activating G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway' (see the link below). There seem to be under different G-protein coupled receptor terms that they are not related to cAMP signaling, which is a pity.
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/chart?ids=GO:1990410,GO:1990408,GO:0007189
Do you think new terms /relations are needed to capture how these pathways work? Or any other suggestions or how to deal with this case?
Thanks,
Penelope
All the UniProt annotations mentioned above have been updated. ( In the end, I added the specific pathway term plus the suggested one GO:0007189.)
The CAFA annotations will not be updated at this point as the evaluation of the submissions is in progress.
@sandyl27, can you review the above CACAO annotation? Just post back on this issue to let us know you've dealt with it (deleted/changed/kept for reason x). Thanks!
I'm going to change it to GO:0030819 positive regulation of cAMP biosynthetic process. Please let me know if you think this is wrong.
Hi @sandyl27 I think you can go ahead and annotate to Trace amine-associated receptor 1 - UniProtKB:Q96RJ0 to ' GO:0004930 G-protein coupled receptor activity' See section "Pharmacological Characterization of the Rat Trace Amine Receptor." - the authors clearly test the G-protein coupled receptor activity: "the striking similarity in amino acid sequence between r2-3 and biogenic amine GPCRs (Fig. 1) indicated that catecholamines or related compounds might activate the receptor. When tested in functional assays of cAMP production"
OK ?
Thanks, Pascale
@pgaudet That makes sense! I just changed it in protein 2 GO.
Hi @happy-lorna @asangrador There are 3 InterPro families with mappings to cAMP biosynthetic process IPR030672 IPR009398 IPR013716
(Do I need to notify you of these or do you have an automatic process to deal with obsolete terms?)
Thanks, Pascale
I am going ahead with the obsoletion, https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/14718
so I am saving the existing annotations 'for the record': https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1b5T4XOVd1yOCi0N5yv1cJ_l77WPwLZk8G_63wl4oIGs/edit#gid=0
Here are the EXP annotations of cAMP biosynthetic process (GO:0006171 ) to proteins OTHER than adenylate cyclase (as far as I was able to tell): Please have a look and see if you rehouse these annotations.