Review annotations to GO:0006182 cGMP biosynthetic process

[pgaudet]

• GO:0006182 cGMP biosynthetic process https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1W0vSSm4M6zB--coMKoYKMRn-bfBU4GXwEzCWhruWhKk/edit#gid=0

Group	Annotation count
dictyBase	2
FlyBase	8
GeneDB	2
MGI	7
MTBBASE	1
RGD	13
TAIR	1
UniProt	17
WB	3

[tberardini]

TAIR annotation removed.

[pfey03]

@pgaudet also this is read only

[vanaukenk]

WB annotations removed.

@pgaudet - just to confirm, are you going to remove the F-P link between guanylate cyclase activity (GO:0004383) and cGMP biosynthetic process (GO:0006182), or just obsolete cGMP biosynthetic process (GO:0006182)?

I just want to make sure the BP annotations don't sneak back in due to the F-P link. Thx.

[ukemi]

MGI's manual annotations have been removed.

[pgaudet]

• just to confirm, are you going to remove the F-P link between guanylate cyclase activity (GO:0004383) and cGMP biosynthetic process (GO:0006182), or just obsolete cGMP biosynthetic process (GO:0006182)?

I though the decision was to obsolete 'cAMP biosynthetic process', therefor I think cGMP biosynthetic process should also be obsoleted. OK ?

Thanks, Pascale

[vanaukenk]

@pgaudet Yes, I think that's okay. I just wanted to be clear on exactly what the plan was. Thx.

[pgaudet]

In fact, all the is_a children of 'cyclic nucleotide metabolic process':

'cyclic nucleotide metabolic process' 'cyclic nucleotide biosynthetic process' 'cyclic nucleotide catabolic process'

'cAMP metabolic process' 'cAMP biosynthetic process' 'cAMP catabolic process'

'cGMP metabolic process' 'cGMP biosynthetic process' 'cGMP catabolic process'

'cyclic purine nucleotide metabolic process' (+ children?)

I am not finished sending the annotation reviews.

Let me know if we're not on the same page.

Thanks, Pascale

[pgaudet]

Excellent.

Techically the documents can now be edited, sorry about that.

Pascale

[hattrill]

FlyBase - done

[pfey03]

Done and replaced

[slaulederkind]

RGD annotations changed or deleted.

[pgarmiri]

The 8 EBI UniProt annotations have been reviewed and changed. @sylvainpoux , could you please ask the curators at SIB to review their annotations? The names of the curators whose annotations are affected are in the spreadsheet. Thanks