Closed vanaukenk closed 5 years ago
We may also need to re-evaluate the annotation to GO:006468 'protein phosphorylation'.
@hdrabkin @ukemi - do you still think the original annotations to PI3Ks from PMID:15192701 are okay? They are quite old.
As far as I can tell they seem to be coming in from PAINT in 2017
@hdrabkin I am looking at this page, for example, at MGI:
http://www.informatics.jax.org/go/marker/MGI:1206581
where I see an IDA annotation to protein phosphorylation from PMID:15192701
Ok, did not notice; and because of that the other Pi3Ks are getting the IBA from Panther?
Yes, it looks that way. Thx.
I see the ones from MGI in our interface. I will check it out. They look suspicious.
So it appears the paper shows "inhibition of either PI3K or Akt prevents the PS1-dependent Akt phosphorylation' ; not that PI3K is directly doing the Akt phosphorylation. So regulation of?
Agreed. It is a downstream effect.
causally-upstream, but important to capture the take-home message of the paper.
I can fix now or you?
Go ahead and fix. You're right, the authors argue that it is regulatory.
Would be a nice one to model (hint hint).
Done; other fish to fry for model (PRO)
Hi,
Can you please take a look at the propagation of GO:0030168 'platelet activation' in PTN000799655.
We are getting an annotation to 'platelet activation' for C. elegans age-1 but C. elegans does not have platelets.
Thx.