geneontology / go-annotation

This repository hosts the tracker for issues pertaining to GO annotations.
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
34 stars 10 forks source link

Review annotations to GO:0051259 'protein complex oligomerization' and children #2521

Open vanaukenk opened 5 years ago

vanaukenk commented 5 years ago

Following on from the 2019-06-11 annotation conference call, we are asking groups to review their annotations to GO:0051259 'protein complex oligomerization' and children terms.

This review is in preparation for obsoletion of these terms in the ontology as capturing the stoichiometry of protein interactions is not within the scope of GO.

Guidelines for how to review and updates annotations to these terms are in the first section of this document on the GO's Google drive.

The full spreadsheet, with tabs for both manual experimental and sequence-based annotations, is here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15tIvSts5PcWidtMpXTQQfjFY3LTYcfjOc62Y5_FeRpU

Please comment in this ticket if you have any questions about existing annotations.

Contributor (Assigned by)

Experimental

image

Sequence

image

Assignees are listed to the right; please remove your name once you've finished reviewing the annotations. Thank you!

Also, for GeneDB annotations: @uliboehme

hattrill commented 5 years ago

FB done

srengel commented 5 years ago

SGD done.

tberardini commented 5 years ago

@ebakker2 Can you please look at the TAIR annotations? Thanks.

pfey03 commented 5 years ago

dictyBase done

keseler commented 5 years ago

EcoCyc done

sabrinatoro commented 5 years ago

I came across a lot of "oligomerization" annotations based on crystallography information.
The information in the publications are: 1) authors mentioning that the proteins exist as trimer/tetramer/..., 2) crystallography analysis of the trimer/tetramer/... There is actually no reported binding experiments. I am tempted to remove these annotations, but I wanted to make sure this is the correct thing to do. Thank you! @vanaukenk @pgaudet

pgaudet commented 5 years ago

@sabrinatoro

Thanks for reporting this. We did decide that the oligomeric state was outside the scope of GO, so deleting would be correct (unfortunately!)

Pascale

sabrinatoro commented 5 years ago

Thank you @pgaudet. ZFIN annotations have been reviewed.

EricaBakker commented 5 years ago

TAIR is done

RLovering commented 5 years ago

HGNC, BHF-UCL, Parkinson's-UCL, ARUK-UCL done

gthayman commented 5 years ago

With the help of Jennifer Smith, RGD is done.

hdrabkin commented 5 years ago

MGI done

srengel commented 4 years ago

ok SGD now really is done ;)

vanaukenk commented 4 years ago

@happy-lorna

As described above, we are going to obsolete the Biological Process terms that describe oligomerization of gene products, as capturing this information is no longer within the scope of GO annotation.

I've added the existing InterPro2GO mappings that use these terms in a separate tab of the annotation review spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15tIvSts5PcWidtMpXTQQfjFY3LTYcfjOc62Y5_FeRpU/

We recommend that all of these mappings be removed.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

pgarmiri commented 4 years ago

Hi, All UniProt-EBI annotations have been reviewed and actions recorded in the spreadsheet. SWIS and SWIP annotations have been tagged. Thanks, Penelope