Closed amandamackie closed 4 years ago
Thanks @amandamackie
Fixed PAINT annotations.
Thanks for the prompt action on those annotations.
Regarding OmpF: it's a non specifc outer membrane porin so its biological function is to mediate diffusion of small solutes; the colicins 'parasitize' it to gain entry into the cell. If you wish to annotate the colicin function then yes, PMID 15465872 could be used, although I think PMID 21098297 (Housden et al 2010) is more definitive.
Similar deal for TolC which is the OM efflux channel for toxic stuff in E. coli but is used by colicins to get into the cell - I haven't got a good reference for it but 15465872 would suffice. PMID 23176499 is a good review for colicin import in general.
PS: I think you've used 'TonB' by mistake in your question; TonB is a different protein - it energizes the import of B12 through BtuB. TolC is the OM channel parasitized by colicins and it is the protein referred to in PMID15465872 (along with OmpF).
I have attached a spreadsheet detailing a dozen wrong annotations that have been imported into EcoCyc for BtuB. The source of the incorrect terms relating to siderophore and enterobactin transport is Panther and the source of the incorrect ion channel terms is CAFA.
BtuB does not mediate enterobactin transport; it is a TonB dependent OM transporter that is specific for cobalamin. It has been extensively studied; a few recentish references are PMIDs 27693114, 24243114, and 14499604. It is also not an ion channel; the literature reference provided for the CAFA annotation is PMID 15465872 Zakharov04 which actually reports that BtuB does not function as an ion channel.
Are you able to remove these annotations? or can you advise me who I should I contact for assistance Thank you Amanda Mackie EcoCyc curator
BtuB GO annotations.xlsx