Open pgaudet opened 2 years ago
CGD done
FB done - i think - are we keeping "histone modification" as a process?
@colinlog said this wasn't useful; what do you think ?
I also wonder if we need 'post (or co)translational protein modification; looking at annotations, I think that the most informative way to capture the modifications are either as (1) processing/maturation, or (2) signaling. If we only know a protein is modified but we dont know why, I'd keep that as a MF only.
What do you think ?
Thanks, Pascale
hi @pgaudet - I am happy to ditch it as it's not a super useful term!
As part of the project of removing single step BPs from the ontology (and moving them to MFs as appropriate), the proposal has been made to obsolete
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14SYbXbhrLgpgiOyIGXJh8AZRFbIrLITOeC67emKrfE8/edit#gid=0
Contributor (Assigned by)
CACAO 1 CAFA 1 CGD 2 FlyBase 4 MTBBASE 1 - Fixed SGD 2 - Fixed UniProt 2 - Fixed