Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago
Original comment by: mah11
Logged In: YES user_id=1549231 Originator: NO
Hi Val, could you be a bit more specific. The signature in IPR006130 identifies the Tyrosine specific protein phosphatases active site; see http://www.expasy.org/prosite/PDOC00323. As far as I can see there are no known exceptions -- if there are can you reactivate and divert any further comments to Swiss-Prot. Thanks david
Original comment by: dmlonsdale
Original comment by: dmlonsdale
Logged In: YES user_id=516865 Originator: YES
O13819 & are O94526
phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphatase activity Catalysis of the reaction: 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol 3-phosphate + H2O = 1-phosphatidyl-1D-myo-inositol + phosphate.
Midor, can you switch to Uniprot?
Thanks
Val
Original comment by: ValWood
Original comment by: mah11
Logged In: YES user_id=1549231 Originator: NO
The two proteins below are very different in terms of the signatures mapping too them - that is other than the protein tyrosine kinase active site. You can view the mapping by using InterproScan.
O13819 maps to IPR010569 Myotubularin-related 094526 maps to IPR014019 Phosphatase tensin type
I guess if you are saying they exhibit phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphatase activity there must be a publication to support?
cheers
David
Original comment by: dmlonsdale
Logged In: YES user_id=516865 Originator: YES
Oh sorry yes, I only checked one of them (I assumed they were pombe / S. cerevisiae orthologs but they are 2 distince proteins.
O94526 is phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase activity Ptn1 in pombe A novel phosphatidylinositol(3,4,5)P3 pathway in fission yeast. PMID: 15249580
It seems that the prosite signature PS00383 is also hitting these.....
for the other one, there is a publication for the S. cerevisiae ortholog.
I think there are also lots publications for the Pten family in higher eukaryotes, but maybe they haven't been curated yet by Uniprot.... Theres an IDA for mouse MGI:109583 and an IGI for Drosopila FBgn0026379
Original comment by: ValWood
Logged In: YES user_id=1549231 Originator: NO
Yes, If they had been Swiss_Prot records they should be marked up as status F (false positive) for the PROSITE pattern. Unfortunately, they are TrEMBL records and they do not have status's and so this will also be the case in InterPro - as all true matches are taken as status T (True)! Might still be worth reporting to Swiss-Prot - so if they become reviewed they will be given status F for the PROSITE.
Original comment by: dmlonsdale
I'm not sure if there is an issue here so clodsing will open a new item if necessary
Original comment by: ValWood
Original comment by: ValWood
ssesm to be lipid phosphatases in pombe
see O13819 & O94526
Reported by: ValWood
Original Ticket: "geneontology/annotation-issues/549":https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/annotation-issues/549