Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago
That would be nice. My lab is annotating about 10 fungal genomes and we have applied this filter in our scripts.
Original comment by: jaiswalp
Hi Pankaj, I've expanded the taxon check for plastids and chloroplasts to:
relationship: never_in_taxon NCBITaxon:33208 {source="PMID:21311032"} ! Metazoa relationship: never_in_taxon NCBITaxon:4751 {source="PMID:21311032"} ! Fungi relationship: never_in_taxon NCBITaxon:28009 {source="PMID:21311032"} ! Choanoflagellida relationship: never_in_taxon NCBITaxon: 554915 {source="PMID:21311032"} ! Amoebozoa
(it was easier to restrict it to the groups without plastids than create a long list of all the algae, plant etc groups that DO have them).
thanks Becky
Original comment by: rebeccafoulger
Original comment by: mah11
Hi Becky, Entry IPR002866 has already changed, and now it matches only plant proteins. It used to have two contributing signatures; the one causing the problem was PF01348, but now this one is in a separate entry (IPR024937, Domain X).
Thanks for pointing this to us. It is useful to review the entries before applying any taxonomic filters, because sometimes they can be improved/corrected , like in this case. Cheers, Amaia
Original comment by: asangrador
Original comment by: asangrador
Original comment by: asangrador
IPR002866 Maturase, MatK has a GO mapping to: GO:0009507 chloroplast
This means that S.pombe Swiss-Prot entries P05511, P03875 and P03876 (amongst others) have IEA annotations to chloroplasts.
I'm looking to expand the taxon restriction of chloroplasts to exclude Fungi (currently it just excludes Metazoa).
Please could you take a look at the IPR002866 mapping. Thanks Becky
Reported by: rebeccafoulger
Original Ticket: geneontology/annotation-issues/925