The proposal has been made to obsolete the following terms:
dodecanoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] hydrolase activity (GO:0047381, EC:3.1.2.21, RHEA:30119) <=4 EXP annotations
myristoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] hydrolase activity (GO:0016295, RHEA:30123) <=3 EXP annotations
oleoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] hydrolase activity (GO:0004320, RHEA:15057) <=0 EXP annotations
palmitoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] hydrolase activity (GO:0016296, RHEA:41932) <=3 EXP annotations
3-oxo-dodecanoyl-ACP hydrolase activity (GO:0102575, no EC/RHEA) <=0 annotations
3-oxo-myristoyl-ACP hydrolase activity (GO:0102574, no EC/RHEA) <=0 annotations
3-oxo-palmitoyl-ACP hydrolase activity (GO:0102576, no EC/RHEA) <=0 annotations
The reason for obsoletion is that these represent specific substrates of their parent, GO:0016297 fatty acyl-[ACP] hydrolase activity. The terms will be replaced by the parent, so no reannotation is needed (all annotations are from UniProt).
The terms are not present in any subsets.
Dear all,
The proposal has been made to obsolete the following terms: dodecanoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] hydrolase activity (GO:0047381, EC:3.1.2.21, RHEA:30119) <=4 EXP annotations myristoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] hydrolase activity (GO:0016295, RHEA:30123) <=3 EXP annotations oleoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] hydrolase activity (GO:0004320, RHEA:15057) <=0 EXP annotations palmitoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] hydrolase activity (GO:0016296, RHEA:41932) <=3 EXP annotations 3-oxo-dodecanoyl-ACP hydrolase activity (GO:0102575, no EC/RHEA) <=0 annotations 3-oxo-myristoyl-ACP hydrolase activity (GO:0102574, no EC/RHEA) <=0 annotations 3-oxo-palmitoyl-ACP hydrolase activity (GO:0102576, no EC/RHEA) <=0 annotations
The reason for obsoletion is that these represent specific substrates of their parent, GO:0016297 fatty acyl-[ACP] hydrolase activity. The terms will be replaced by the parent, so no reannotation is needed (all annotations are from UniProt). The terms are not present in any subsets.
You can comment on the ticket: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/25677
Thanks, Pascale