geneontology / go-ontology

Source ontology files for the Gene Ontology
http://geneontology.org/page/download-ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
220 stars 40 forks source link

GO:1990814 DNA/DNA annealing activity vs. GO:0036310 annealing helicase activity #12465

Closed ValWood closed 7 years ago

ValWood commented 8 years ago

A GO:1990814 DNA/DNA annealing activity A nucleic acid binding activity that brings together complementary sequences of ssDNA so that they pair by hydrogen bonds to form a double-stranded DNA. (only PomBase has used in experimental annotation)

B GO:0036310 annealing helicase activity Catalysis of the ATP-dependent rewinding of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to reform base pairs between strands. Often acts on ssDNA bubbles bound by replication protein A (RPA).

  1. B (Annealing helicase) is a descendant of DNA strand renaturation
  2. A. GO:1990814 DNA/DNA annealing activity SHOULD also be a descendant of DNA strand renaturation
  3. I can't see a difference between A and B except \ that B is defined as a helicase and A isn't, However, isn't all annealing activity helicases?
  4. The term name for B says that it is a helicase, but this is not reflected in the definition, or the parentage.....

Suggest a merge and rehash of def and parents....

ValWood commented 8 years ago

Alos add synonyms DNA annealing... GO:0000733 DNA strand renaturation GO:0061306 DNA strand renaturation involved in double-strand break repair

(wouldn't that be a better primary name with a definitions tweak? current term sounds more like the assay than the BP)

ValWood commented 8 years ago

Also isn't renaturation a geometric change rather than metabolic process? as is only base-pairing? (at least its a conformational change...but I think its both?)

ValWood commented 8 years ago

Whatever the outcome, we need an ATP-dependent and ATP-independent version of the DNA/DNA annealing activity term

RecA, for example is ATP-dependent, condensin is ATP-independent

ukemi commented 8 years ago
B (Annealing helicase) is a descendant of DNA strand renaturation
A. GO:1990814 DNA/DNA annealing activity SHOULD also be a descendant of DNA strand renaturation

Not necessarily. What if it is strand invasion? Then is is not renaturation. It is de novo annealing.

I can't see a difference between A and B *except * that B is defined as a helicase and A isn't, However, isn't all annealing activity helicases?

I don't think recombinases are helicases are they?

The term name for B says that it is a helicase, but this is not reflected in the definition, or the parentage.....

A helicase is defined as driving the unwinding of DNA, so despite the name, this does the opposite.

So you want DNA/DNA annealing ATPase activity?

ValWood commented 8 years ago

Not necessarily. What if it is strand invasion? Then is is not renaturation. It is de novo annealing.

OK good point!

OK, So GO:0000150 should be a descendant of GO:01990814?

parent

ValWood commented 8 years ago

The annealing helicase should probably have some existing terms as descendants too... and some of those kids will also be under DNA/DNA annealing....

ukemi commented 8 years ago

I'm not sure they should be descendants. Maybe they should have has_part relations. I think they do more than just strand invasion. Let me know if you know mechanisms of the specific enzymes. Otherwise I think we can close this and add them as we come across them.

ValWood commented 8 years ago

The rad51 recombinase doe shave other MF's but recombinase activity is defined as

Catalysis of the identification and base-pairing of homologous sequences between single-stranded DNA and double-stranded DNA. (although it has the comment "Note that this term represents activities that do not break or form phosphodiester bonds," which seems that it should be part of the definition?

So for example pombe rad51 is annotated to both "recombinase" and "protein loading ATPase"

ValWood commented 8 years ago

Hmm, is recombinase is a collection of activities/gene product name?

ukemi commented 7 years ago

Val, What would you like for me to do with this? -D

ValWood commented 7 years ago

I think you can close it. I think there are some problems in the recombination part of the GO graph, but I don't understand recombination well enough to know exactly what they are. Thye will probably become resolved as a LEGO model is built (there is clearly enough functional data to model this process). val

ukemi commented 7 years ago

OK. I am making a list of areas of the ontology that need refinement. I will add it to that. So far in this area, I've got both repair and recombination.