geneontology / go-ontology

Source ontology files for the Gene Ontology
http://geneontology.org/page/download-ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
216 stars 40 forks source link

Consistency in labels of (cellular) metabolic processes #17904

Open paolaroncaglia opened 4 years ago

paolaroncaglia commented 4 years ago

Hi, Not sure if there's already an ongoing discussion on this. GO differentiates between GO:0008152 metabolic process (The chemical reactions and pathways, including anabolism and catabolism, by which living organisms transform chemical substances.) and its child GO:0044237 cellular metabolic process (The chemical reactions and pathways by which individual cells transform chemical substances.). However, not all descendants of 'cellular metabolic process' contain 'cellular' in their label (though some do in their exact synonyms). See e.g. the Ancestor chart in https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/term/GO:0006593 where alpha amino acid metabolic process, alpha amino acid catabolic process, ornithine metabolic process and ornithine catabolic process don't contain 'cellular' in their label. There is 'cellular amino acid metabolic process' but no 'amino acid metabolic process'. Ultimately, amino acids are synthesized at the level of a single cell, so I get why 'amino acid metabolic process' is less useful. But then you have 'negative regulation of ornithine catabolic process' is a subclass of 'negative regulation of cellular amino acid metabolic process' The ancestry shows that 'negative regulation of ornithine catabolic process' refers to the single-cell process, but the name doesn't, and the parentage to a 'cellular' term may seem incorrect at first glance. Being more consistent with including 'cellular' in labels (or not) would help. Thanks, Paola

pgaudet commented 4 years ago

We want to merge all those. Maybe to discuss on an ontology call for the strategy? Should we drop the 'cellular' terms (since this is implied) ?

Thanks, Pascale

ukemi commented 4 years ago

If we have decided to merge these, then I suggest that they be merged in the non-cellular direction. The result will be that there will not be a direct link to cellular process in the ontology.

cmungall commented 4 years ago

My proposal makes metabolic process a subclass of cellular process. https://gist.github.com/cmungall/4ed28123c3db832a7d99cbdd8e8a5920

I think the use case for CP is a grouping for things at a level of granularity

ukemi commented 4 years ago

But if you ask an endocrinologist to describe glucose metabolism, I suspect they will talk about it at a system and organismal level.

pgaudet commented 1 year ago
pgaudet commented 1 year ago

Obsolete with replaced by:

Obsolete, unnecessary grouping class:

pgaudet commented 1 year ago
pgaudet commented 1 year ago
pgaudet commented 1 year ago
pgaudet commented 1 year ago

Still need to look at: (list not exhaustive):