Closed sjm41 closed 4 years ago
GO:0003913; updated to EC:4.1.99.3 and RHEA:10672 GO:0034579; removed GO:0071771; go def does not agree with assigned EC (4.1.99.5) used for def, and the gene mentioned in the publication uses the RHEA def I would get looking up 4.1.99.5 def and not the GO Def. @tberardini , this term was requested by Kate Dreher of Tair; can you trace? I think the def should be A long-chain aldehyde + O(2) + 2 NADPH <=> an alkane + formate + H(2)O + 2 NADP(+) (from EC def, to be changed to RHEA def a long-chain fatty aldehyde + H(+) + 2 NADPH + O2 = a long-chain alkane + formate + H2O + 2 NADP(+)
GO:0003913; updated to EC:4.1.99.3 and RHEA:10672
I'm not sure that's right. GO:0003913 is "DNA photolyase activity" EC:4.1.99.3 is "Deoxyribodipyrimidine photo-lyase."
and a child of GO:0003913 is "deoxyribodipyrimidine photo-lyase activity" (GO:0003904) that already has the specific EC:4.1.99.3 xref.
So I think GO:0003913/"DNA photolyase activity" can't have an EC xref.
Hi Harold - just checking you saw my last reply on this?
@tberardini Hi Tanya - Any thoughts on this, or the related #18148?
I made the assignment based on DNA photolyase as a synonym in EC:4.1.99.3; https://enzyme.expasy.org/EC/4.1.99.3 However, I will move the RHEA
Ah, I see. I guess we'll then have two GO terms with the same EC xref - is that OK?
[Term] id: GO:0003913 name: DNA photolyase activity def: "Catalysis of the repair of a photoproduct resulting from ultraviolet irradiation of two adjacent pyrimidine residues in DNA." [GOC:mah, PMID:11124949] xref: EC:4.1.99.3
[Term] id: GO:0003904 name: deoxyribodipyrimidine photo-lyase activity def: "Catalysis of the reaction: cyclobutadipyrimidine (in DNA) = 2 pyrimidine residues (in DNA). This reaction represents the reactivation of irradiated DNA by light." [EC:4.1.99.3] xref: EC:4.1.99.3
Yes absolutely because the EC is more about mechanism whereas RHEA is about the substrates and products. However, you know looking at the def "...two adjacent pyrimidine residues" in one and .. cyclobutadipyrimidine (in DNA); I can't really think of how the two pyrimidines would be anthing other than adjacent. Maybe these should be merged
Note that id: GO:0003913 (DNA photolyase activity) is actually a parent of these two child terms, implying there must be some (intended) difference in scope of the 3 of them:
[Term] id: GO:0003904 name: deoxyribodipyrimidine photo-lyase activity def: "Catalysis of the reaction: cyclobutadipyrimidine (in DNA) = 2 pyrimidine residues (in DNA). This reaction represents the reactivation of irradiated DNA by light." [EC:4.1.99.3] xref: EC:4.1.99.3
id: GO:0003914 name: DNA (6-4) photolyase activity def: "Catalysis of the reaction: pyrimidine-pyrimidone (6-4) photoproduct (in DNA) = 2 pyrimidine residues (in DNA). Catalyzes the reactivation of ultraviolet-irradiated DNA." [GOC:mah, PMID:11124949] xref: EC:4.1.99.13
Hm. The 6-4 is a specific reactant apparently occurring 33% of the time https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrimidine_dimer
If anything, GO:0003913 and GO:0003904 appear to be the same, but GO:0003904 is more specific. But apparently most people think of the 6,6,5,5 dimer unless otherwise noted. see https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Pyrimidine-dimers-are-the-main-UV-induced-DNA-photoproducts-and-affect-the-phosphodiester_fig1_323371532
I haven't looked at these in many years, but I did put in some of the definitions back in the day. They are indeed a bit different, as Steven has inferred/guessed. There are (at least) two possible photoproducts that can form when UV hits two adjacent pyrimidines.
I found the introduction to https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz359 helpful to dredge up the memory. There may be room to improve the the text defs, and I really can't help with the ER xrefs, but the ontology structure looks correct.
No wait. I take back the merge. The RHEA that goes with the EC and will go with GO:0003904 and not GO:0003913, specifically uses CHEBI term CHEBI:65263 for the 6,6,5,5
Also requesting a RHEA for the 6-4 product while I"m at it. RHEA ticket 176724
RHEA:62232 thymidine(6-4)thymidine in DNA = thymidine dimer in DNA RHEA:62236 cytidine(6-4)cytidine in DNA = cytosine dimer in DNA + H+ RHEA:62240 thymidine(6-4)cytidine in DNA = thymine-cytidine dinucleotide in DNA RHEA:62244 cytidine(6-4)thymidine in DNA = cytidine-thymine dinucleotide in DNA
They will be linked to EC 4.1.99.13, but the generic reaction will still be a text reaction, as we cannot create "a pyrimidine" in Rhea, for that cytosine and thymine are too different. The reaction should become available in release 2020_02 tentatively scheduled for 26 February 2020.
Maybe you tried to delete it but something went wrong??
apparently something did. I'm surprised that the :: is not picked up in a travis check. I'm going in now to fix
Looks like the syntax of the malformed xref got modified when I copied and pasted. It's actually "xref: EC:\:4.1.99.3"
Gone.
4.1.99.- is for all "Other carbon-carbon lyases" in EC: https://enzyme.expasy.org/EC/4.1.99.-
As such, I think it needs to be removed as an xref on these more specific GO terms:
[Term] id: GO:0003913 name: DNA photolyase activity xref: EC:4.1.99
[Term] id: GO:0034579 name: (1-methylpentyl)succinate synthase activity xref: EC:4.1.99
[Term] id: GO:0071771 name: aldehyde decarbonylase activity xref: EC:4.1.99 N.B. see related ticket on this particular term - #18148