Closed pgaudet closed 4 years ago
No, but we do have one to GO:0052007 biosynthesis by symbiont of substance in host. Now fixed in internal database; will become visible with next release in March 2020.
But the process does exist. In this case an anthrax bacillus synthesizes something that is metabolized further when taken up by the infected human host so it's a disease process and out of scope for GO anyway, but the process seems real. Or am I misinterpreting the phrase "biosynthesis by symbiont of substance in host"?
Also found an InterPro mapping to http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/entry/InterPro/IPR015845/ It seems a plasmid involved transfer of an infective plasmid with metabolic genes
Oh sorry that's the other way around. We are discussing "by host in symbiont" terms
Thanks @deustp01
out of scope for GO anyway, but the process seems real.
I think you are interpreting the process correctly - but in this example, as you point out, the host probably gets tricked into metabolizing the toxic compound.
In other cases - say a symbiont takes advantage that a metabolite is present in the host, and further metabolizes it, I wouldn't say this is a 'multi-organism process' - the two organisms are not producing the compound together, but the host just happens to be the environment in which the symbiont lives.
Do you see cases where these terms would be appropriate for GO annotations ?
Thanks, Pascale
Nitrogen fixation in plants? Shared metabolic processes in lichens (no clue from here what these might amount to)? Intracellular protozoan symbionts scavanging nucleotide intermediates that they can't synthesize de novo? Humans scavanging vitamin K metabolites from gut bacteria? The metabolism that accompanies quorum sensing?
and anyway trickery is a normal part of a lot of organismal behavior.
Just happens to be there to take advantage? Possibly, but another possibility is co-evolution.
N fixation is only done solely by the bacteria - N2 is absorbed by the plant; isn't it ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_fixation
There is certainly symbiosis and co-evolution (some organisms do not make certain compound because they are provided by others) - is this case the plant does host the bacteria since having N2 is essential - but does not participate in the biosynthesis.
Humans scavanging vitamin K metabolites from gut bacteria
Again this is the source of the compound, I dont see how this process is accomplished by the two species.
I can hold this one off to leave time for other comments.
Thanks, Pascale
Dear all,
The proposal has been made to obsolete:
The reason for obsoletion is that there is no evidence that hosts and symbionts have common biosynthesis processes (even though some substances produced by one organism may be used by the other).
There is one InterPro mapping to this term, IPR015845. There are no manual annotations. Those terms are not present in any slims.
Any comments can be made to the ticket: geneontology/go-ontology#18787
We are opening a comment period for this proposed obsoletion. We’d like to proceed and obsolete this term on March 3rd, 2020. Unless objections are received by March 3rd, 2020, we will assume that you agree to this change.
Thanks, Pascale
@happy-lorna Can you please see if you can remove/change mapping for IPR015845 ?
There is no evidence that 'multi-organism biosynthesis' exists - so the following terms will be obsoleted:
There is one 1 TAS annotation by Reactome to 'biosynthesis by host of substance in symbiont' @deustp01
Thanks, Pascale