geneontology / go-ontology

Source ontology files for the Gene Ontology
http://geneontology.org/page/download-ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
223 stars 40 forks source link

NTR: microtubule stabilizing activity (was: NTR:microtubule severing inhibitor activity) #23014

Closed magrane closed 2 years ago

magrane commented 2 years ago

Please provide as much information as you can:

ValWood commented 2 years ago

Sorry to complicate this but:

We have a number tickets to migrate of actin -related processes that are really "activities" out of the BP ontology. We would eventually want to do the same for microtubule processes that are single-step, like "microtubule severing".

This new term might be better are a Molecular function "microtubule serving inhibitor"

Here is a related (open) ticket for actin severing activity, and actin severing inhibitor https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/18437

pgaudet commented 2 years ago

~I created this:~

~+[Term] +id: GO:0140775 +name: microtubule severing inhibitor activity +namespace: molecular_function +def: "Binds to and stops, prevents, or reduces the activity of a microtubule severing protein." [PMID:34970964] +is_a: GO:0140678 ! molecular function inhibitor activity +property_value: term_tracker_item https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/23014 xsd:anyURI +created_by: pg +creation_date: 2022-03-22T10:23:35Z~ +

But I am not sure this is right - I think this is a microtubule stabilizer activity. We dont have 'stabilizer' as molecular function, but I think that would be useful? I remember we mentioned that before, but I cannot find where...

Thanks, Pascale

ValWood commented 2 years ago

stabilizer might be better. We have talked about "stabilizer' a lot, particularly in the context of RNA binding proteins that stabilize mRNAs. I'm not sure if it ever made it into a ticket.

pgaudet commented 2 years ago

This is from an email exchange with Paul, David and Kimberly:

However we need to see how that fits with the BP:

These are potentially phenotypes , as @ValWood mentioned in https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/20132#issuecomment-755229210

"stability" has multiple meanings. There is the very direct "binding to a protein or mRNA to stabilize it" (MF), but stability is also used for stability of protein or mRNA is over its lifetime" which is not really determined by a single process, but is a balance between translation, or mRNA/protein catabolism. So, is stabilization itself really a process ?

pgaudet commented 2 years ago

So, I will change the new term ~GO:0140775~ microtubule severing inhibitor activity, to 'microtubule stabilizing activity', and put that as a child of the new term GO:0140777 protein-containing complex stabilizing activity see #23062

@magrane Does that work for you ?

Thanks, Pascale

EDITED: Note that the term creation was not complete, so I'll start over with the 'microtubule stabilizing activity'

pgaudet commented 2 years ago

+[Term] +id: GO:0140778 +name: microtubule stabilizing activity +namespace: molecular_function +def: "A protein-containing complex stabilizing activity that prevents dissociation of microtubules," [PMID:34970964] +is_a: GO:0140777 ! protein-containing complex stabilizing activity +property_value: term_tracker_item https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/23014 xsd:anyURI +created_by: pg +creation_date: 2022-03-23T13:20:26Z

pgaudet commented 2 years ago

Maybe we'll need to improve the term labels and definitions later. Right now all examples are on protein complexes (microtubules and actin filaments). Also the definition doesn't mention protection from degradation.

This is a bit restrictive because we don't want to overlap with chaperones, sequestering and other activities.

pgaudet commented 2 years ago

@ccasalsc