Open ValWood opened 11 months ago
It seems that iron-siderophore uptake can be both vesicle-mediated transport and via transmembrane transporters.
However, since the siderophore system is only used for uptake, should
GO:0044718 siderophore transmembrane transport be part_of GO:0033214 siderophore-dependent iron import into cell
(O:0015343 siderophore-iron transmembrane transporter activity is already part_of
In fact, this looks slightly odd:
Why isn't
siderophore-dependent iron import into cell A process in which iron (Fe3+) is solubilized by ferric iron-specific chelators, known as siderophores, excreted by a cell; the iron-siderophore complex is then transported into the cell by specific cell surface receptors. PMID:16963626
part_of siderophore transport?
Suggest
GO:0044718 siderophore transmembrane transport is_a GO:0033214 siderophore-dependent iron import into cell
Revise/clarify definition GO:0033214 siderophore-dependent iron import into cell A process in which iron (Fe3+) is solubilized by ferric iron-specific chelators, known as siderophores, excreted by a cell; the iron-siderophore complex is then transported into the cell by specific cell surface receptors. PMID:16963626 -> A process in which iron (Fe3+) is solubilized by ferric iron-specific chelators, known as siderophores, the iron-siderophore complex is then transported into the cell by specific cell surface receptors or transmembrane transporters. PMID:16963626
@pgaudet let me know if this sound OK, no hurry
This branch is odd.
As discussed yesterday, we should obsolete 'siderophore transport' since it doesn't describe the mechanism. As it is, these 3 highlighted terms seem redundant:
However, do we need 'siderophore export'? I suppose the empty siderophore must be exported to get the iron? I am not sure how that part works. Other the 3 other terms, at least based on their parentage, seem redundant to me.
What do you think ?
Export seems to be tm transport too, at least in some systems: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23431276/ These results identified MmpS4/MmpL4 and MmpS5/MmpL5 as siderophore export systems in Mtb and revealed that the MmpL proteins transport small molecules other than lipids. MmpS4 and MmpS5 resemble periplasmic adapter proteins of tripartite efflux pumps of Gram-negative bacteria, however, they are not only required for export but also for efficient siderophore synthesis.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14638426/ The csbX gene of Azotobacter vinelandii was regulated in an iron-repressible manner from a divergent promoter upstream of the catecholate siderophore biosynthesis (csb) operon and was predicted to encode an efflux pump of the major facilitator superfamily. Other proteins that were most similar to CsbX were encoded by genes found in the catecholate siderophore biosynthesis operons of Aeromonas hydrophila and Stigmatella aurantiaca. Inactivation of csbX resulted in 57-100% decrease in the amount of catecholates released when compared to the wild-type in iron-limited medium. CsbX was most important for the export of the high affinity chelator protochelin with the majority of the catecholates released by csbX mutants being the protochelin intermediates azotochelin and aminochelin.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21306443/ Results establish that EntS and IroC mediate specific export of catecholate siderophores and the role of these exporters for ExPEC virulence is contingent on enterobactin synthesis, which is not required when other siderophores like aerobactin are functional.
The process of siderophore transport system also includes a secreted ferric reductase which solubilizes /reduces the iron from Fe 3+ to Fe 2+
reductive iron assimilation seems surplus too. (this is a single step in the multistep transport process)
This was the problem I was trying to solve. I annotated to
I expected the IBA to be covered by this IMP annotation.
GO:0033214 siderophore-dependent iron import into cell
GO:0044718 siderophore transmembrane transport