Remove logical definition from GO:0022414 reproductive process

[pgaudet]

Remove logical definition from GO:0022414 reproductive process

[cmungall]

This is a band-aid over the fact that having two concepts for "reproductive process" and "reproduction" only makes sense to ontologists (insofar as we have these two concepts, the logical definition is actually correct).

My favored solutions in order:

1. obsolete "reproductive process". It provides zero information.
2. place a do_not_annotate on "reproductive process"
3. remove the logical definition

But any solution is better than none.

These are the direct annotations by evidence:

All the experimentals are unsurprisingly IMP:

I think these can easily be moved down to reproduction. This means there is no obstacles to either 1 or 2.

[pgaudet]

OK - last time I checked I got stuck in the of moving all children to other parents; they cannot all move to is_a reproduction (but this is the general for a x process terms, for example this is why we have 'apoptotic process' and not 'apoptosis'

'acrosome reaction' 'cellular process involved in reproduction in multicellular organism' dehiscence 'developmental process involved in reproduction' 'embryo implantation' 'embryonic process involved in female pregnancy' fertilization 'fetal process involved in parturition' 'gamete generation' 'gonad development' 'mammalian oogenesis stage' 'maternal process involved in female pregnancy' 'maternal process involved in parturition' 'mating plug formation' 'meiotic cell cycle' 'meiotic cell cycle process' 'meiotic drive' 'menstrual cycle' 'mucilage extrusion from seed coat' 'multi-organism reproductive process' 'multicellular organismal reproductive process' ovulation 'ovulation cycle' 'ovulation cycle process' 'penile erection' pollination 'positive regulation of flagellated sperm motility involved in capacitation' 'premature acrosome loss' 'reproductive process in single-celled organism' 'reproductive shoot system development' 'seed maturation' 'seminal clot liquefaction' 'sperm ejaculation' 'sperm motility'

[pgaudet]

I removed the LD for reproductive process. I'll leave this open for obsoletion of reproductive process, but I am not sure where to move all the children.

[raymond91125]

I removed the LD for reproductive process. I'll leave this open for obsoletion of reproductive process, but I am not sure where to move all the children.

https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/pull/27063

[raymond91125]

I actually think "reproductive process" is a better term than "reproduction" as defined. Reproductive process is defined as "A biological process that directly contributes to the process of producing new individuals by one or two organisms. The new individuals inherit some proportion of their genetic material from the parent or parents." In fact, "reproduction" has an exact synonym "reproductive physiological process". I suggest that we obsolete reproduction as it has the mixed meaning of the end goal and the process with the definition "The production of new individuals that contain some portion of genetic material inherited from one or more parent organisms."

[pgaudet]

Ontology call: agree to replace "reproduction" by "reproductive process"

[pgaudet]

Also please replace

• GO:0032505 reproduction of a single-celled organism by GO:0022413 reproductive process in single-celled organism
• GO:0032504 multicellular organism reproduction by GO:0048609 multicellular organismal reproductive process

[pgaudet]

Add DO NOT ANNOTATE on GO:0022414 reproductive process and other GO:0032504 multicellular organism reproduction and GO:0032505 reproduction of a single-celled organism b

[raymond91125]

@pgaudet Should I simply transfer the slims over to reproductive process?

[pgaudet]

@raymond91125

Should I simply transfer the slims over to reproductive process?

Yes, thanks