geneontology / go-ontology

Source ontology files for the Gene Ontology
http://geneontology.org/page/download-ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
223 stars 40 forks source link

NTR: tunneling nanotube #27706

Closed lubianat closed 6 months ago

lubianat commented 6 months ago

Please provide as much information as you can:

The Wikipedia article treats cytonemes (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/GTerm?id=GO:0035230) as TNT-like projections (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytoneme).

The review cited as reference divides them and other TNT-like structures. There might be some extra modeling necessary.

image

It could be reasonable to model like:

For the two last terms there seems to be less supporting literature, so maybe they should not be curated at the moment.

In any case, I am not an expert in such projections. I just found the TNT structure to be missing in GO and though about sharing.

raymond91125 commented 6 months ago

It seems to me that it is not trivial to come up with necessary and sufficient definitions for TNT and TNT-like projections. e.g. wikipedia:Cytoneme says that TNT is a type of filopodia but the review (Table 2) indicates that TNT and filopodia are distinct. PMID:14963329 states "These structures facilitate the selective transfer of membrane vesicles and organelles but seem to impede the flow of small molecules. " Has this been refuted? Are there gene products that can help to distinguish between these structures? If not, do we want to strive to model them now?

cmungall commented 6 months ago

@lubianat do you have a use case such as distinguishing between different cell types?

lubianat commented 6 months ago

No application in mind, and I don't think there are particular markers of the structure. I think this would be a low-priority ticket.

I was reading this article about mRNA transfer between cell types (https://www.jidonline.org/article/S0022-202X(19)31568-4/fulltext) trying to understand some scRNA-seq data and it popped up.

I hadn't seen a mention of the structure before, but there seem to be quite a few mentions of the terms in the literature (66 on PubMed).

The only use I see in the moment is generic (e.g. for entity grounding in text annotation).

pgaudet commented 6 months ago

Maybe we shouldn't create this term then, it seems like it will be difficult to annotate, without a clear, unique description.

raymond91125 commented 6 months ago

Thanks for the comments. We can reopen this ticket when annotations are ready to be made.