Open pgaudet opened 2 months ago
Hi @pgaudet
We should have a check that any def xref to these databases should ALSO be an general xref.
Agreed, though I think my https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/28146#issuecomment-2233348302 was for a slightly different check - i.e check for terms that have the same MetaCyc/KEGG (or indeed RHEA/EC) definition xref.
But I guess your suggested check will effectively do the same thing - if we ensure that a def xref ALSO appears as a general xref, then any duplicate def xrefs will get flagged up by the existing checks for duplicate general xrefs.
So, all is probably fine!
Right, this is what I meant - once all def xrefs are also general xrefs then we only need to check general xrefs for duplications.
(to address https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/28146#issuecomment-2233348302 requested by @sjm41 )
There are many cases where the definition cross references and the general cross references don't match.
Minimally for
We should have a check that any def xref to these databases should ALSO be an general xref.
Thanks, Pascale