Open pgaudet opened 2 months ago
And once that is done, we should remove any asserted TCs on the regulation terms, to make sure TCs are consistent, or define cases where there should be exceptions.
We have two terms with problems when we propagate 'in taxon' over 'regulates':
[x] envenomation resulting in plasminogen activation in another organism: removed logical definition: -intersection_of: GO:0035738 ! envenomation resulting in modulation of process in another organism -intersection_of: has_part GO:0042730 ! fibrinolysis -intersection_of: has_part GO:0044542 ! symbiont-mediated activation of host plasminogen
[x] suppression by virus of host natural killer cell activation:
removed asserted superclass GO:0032815 ! negative regulation of natural killer cell activation
Hopefully that will fix the issue.
Thanks, Pascale
Thanks @pgaudet looks like those changes do clear the problems.
Hi @balhoff
Now that we have a new relation to express regulation in another organism, we can propagate taxon constraints over the 'regulates' relation. This doesn't seem to be happening, see
has no taxon constraints
but the 'non-regulatory' parent does: