search

geneontology / go-ontology

Source ontology files for the Gene Ontology
http://geneontology.org/page/download-ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
223 stars 40 forks source link

Cell Fate Determination - Expansion #297

Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago

gocentral commented 22 years ago

This is related to http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=579120&group_id=36855&atid=440764 (Cell Fate Determination).

I'm wondering if it would be reasonable to expand the termset for this branch to include many of the cell types that were related in a list that Judy recently shared with the group (http://www.geneontology.org/email/go-arc/go- 2002/1679.html). There was a call to discuss this more fully on the GO Consortium e-mail list, but I'm wondering if some utilization of the list might be made while resolution of this discussion is pending.

Reported by: ceyockey

Original Ticket: "geneontology/ontology-requests/297":https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/ontology-requests/297

gocentral commented 22 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=463625

Hi Courtland,

We agree with you here but it will take a little time to implement. The girls are all quite busy. These cell types also need inserted into cell differentiation and cell proliferation lineages...I'm not sure I agree with all of Judys list but its a start as you say....

I'm only replying becuase they are busy...and I agree with you.

cheers Evelyn

Original comment by: nobody

gocentral commented 22 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=473796

Which of the cell types on the list are contentious / don't you agree with?

Original comment by: nobody

gocentral commented 22 years ago

Original comment by: nobody

gocentral commented 21 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=631592

Hi Courtland,

At the last GO meeting, we decided to organize cell differentiation as follows:

cell differentiation < cell fate commitment (cell fate specification) < cell fate determination < cell development (cell morphogenesis or cell maturation) Differentiation of every cell type could be added as type of children here. I think we should add the terms that are stemming from the current discussion on hemopoeisis, but there will be a much better way to handle this in the future. Chris gave a great presentation in St. Croix about how to handle issues like this. Do you have any comments on the hemopoeisis thread?

David

Original comment by: ukemi

gocentral commented 21 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=451873

To be handled as slots. See hemopoiesis SourceForge item/email archive for cell type discussion.

Original comment by: nobody

gocentral commented 21 years ago

Original comment by: nobody