Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago
Logged In: YES user_id=473890 Originator: NO
Hi Val,
I'll get someone from SGD to take a look.
thanks,
-Karen
Original comment by: krchristie
Logged In: YES user_id=777884 Originator: NO
Hi Val,
The phrase "loss of chromatin silencing" or "loss of transcriptional silencing" is used in the yeast literature to describe what happens when the SIR protein complex is redistributed from regions that are silenced (like telomeres) to the nucleolus. The redistribution leads to loss of transcriptional repression at a site. Maybe it's too jargony a term for GO? I guess it could be merged with 'negative regulation of chromatin silencing'. (But that may be confusing to people because loss of silencing actually results in transcription of the silenced gene, so negative regulation of silencing leads to activation of transcription--and positive regulation leads to repression of transcription at the silenced locus).
I don't know...since GO contains all those 'regulation of silencing' terms, as child terms of 'chromatin silencing', there must have been a feeling that we didn't have that biology covered by the 'loss of' terms.
I think 'loss of chromatin silencing during replicatvie cell aging' is a process, based on papers like:
PMID: 9150138 Redistribution of silencing proteins from telomeres to the nucleolus is associated with extension of life span in S. cerevisiae.
Let me know what you think about merging 'loss of chromatin silencing' with 'negative regulation of chromatin silencing' and I can ask other SGDers to weigh in. We'd then have to change 'loss of chromatin silencing during replicatvie cell aging' to 'negative regulation of chromatin silencing during replicative cell aging'.
Jodi
Original comment by: jodih
Logged In: YES user_id=516865 Originator: YES
Perhaps it is OK and just needs moving to under chromatin silencing. We have a chromatin expert here in the pombe microarray group. I'll check with him over the next couple of days.
Val
Original comment by: ValWood
Original comment by: mah11
Hi Val,
Could we mark this as out-of-date then?
Thanks, Jane Becky and Paola
Original comment by: paolaroncaglia
Hi
I think this could still be adressed. I just spoke to Midori and neither of us can see any reason why "loss of chromatin silencing" cannot be merged into negative regualtion of chromatin silenciong. They seem to be equivalent based on def, parentage and siblings.
We think the loss of silencing probably predates the regulation terms and was housed under here, but it does seem to be equivalent.
Cheers Val
Original comment by: ValWood
Original comment by: mah11
Original comment by: paolaroncaglia
Original comment by: jl242
Merged 'loss of chromatin silencing' into 'negative regulation of chromatin silencing'
Changed name of GO:0001308 from "loss of chromatin silencing involved in replicative cell aging" to "negative regulation of chromatin silencing involved in replicative cell aging"
Original comment by: jl242
Original comment by: jl242
I spotted this term, but I'm not really sure what it means
loss of chromatin silencing
The process leading to expression of genes that are typically not expressed due to silencing by regulatory proteins.
It looks like a sort of 'regulation of chromatin silencing'
At least, it should have a relationship to
chromatin silencing.
It looks like its the opposite of :
maintenance of chromatin silencing The maintenance of chromatin in a transciptionally silent heterochromatin state.
its child term is also odd... loss of chromatin silencing during replicative cell aging
I'm not sure this really is a process but something which occurs due to accumulated mutations as a cell ages
Reported by: ValWood
Original Ticket: "geneontology/ontology-requests/3799":https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/ontology-requests/3799