geneontology / go-ontology

Source ontology files for the Gene Ontology
http://geneontology.org/page/download-ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
220 stars 40 forks source link

glycine dehydrogenase complex (decarboxylating) #4817

Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago

gocentral commented 16 years ago

glycine dehydrogenase complex (decarboxylating)

can you add a note that this refers to subunits P & T (in S. cerevisiae GCV2 and 1) as I used it incorrectly.

Also, could synonyms be added so that if you search on glycine dehydrogenase complex you also find glycine cleavage complex and vice versa.

v

Reported by: ValWood

Original Ticket: "geneontology/ontology-requests/4832":https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/ontology-requests/4832

gocentral commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=436423 Originator: NO

Do you have a reference? Looking at the EC and MetaCyc entries, I'm not sure we should even have a separate term ... looks like glycine dehydrogenase (decarboxylating) is a single protein. There are two copies of it in the glycine cleavage system complex, but I'm not seeing anything that says they form a separate complex.

http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iubmb/enzyme/EC1/4/4/2.html http://BioCyc.org/META/NEW-IMAGE?type=ENZYME&object=CPLX-7302

I could just merge ... m

Original comment by: mah11

gocentral commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=554736 Originator: NO

I agree with Midori. As far as I can tell, in yeast we don't have evidence to show that these two proteins exists in a complex. Merging is fine with me.

rama

Original comment by: rbalakri

gocentral commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=516865 Originator: YES

I'm happy to merge.

Original comment by: ValWood

gocentral commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=436423 Originator: NO

merged glycine dehydrogenase complex (decarboxylating) GO:0005961 into glycine cleavage complex GO:0005960

Original comment by: mah11

gocentral commented 16 years ago

Original comment by: mah11

gocentral commented 13 years ago

Original comment by: mah11