geneontology / go-ontology

Source ontology files for the Gene Ontology
http://geneontology.org/page/download-ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
216 stars 40 forks source link

parentage for guanine-Nx-methyltransferases? #4892

Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago

gocentral commented 16 years ago

Hi,

I was looking at terms like: rRNA (guanine-N1-)-methyltransferase activity ; GO:0008989 rRNA (guanine-N2-)-methyltransferase activity ; GO:0008990

and wondering if they should also be children of:

N-methyltransferase activity ; GO:0008170

thanks,

-Karen

Reported by: krchristie

Original Ticket: "geneontology/ontology-requests/4907":https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/ontology-requests/4907

gocentral commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=473890 Originator: YES

same question for other descendents of 'RNA methyltransferase activity' (GO:0008173) that have "-Nx-" where x is a number in the term name, but it will be pretty slow to copy/paste them all here, and a lot faster for someone who's viewing the tree to click around and find them.

thanks,

-Karen

Original comment by: krchristie

gocentral commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=436423 Originator: NO

makes sense to me, and I can add the relationships next time I'm editing (unless you want to)

m

Original comment by: mah11

gocentral commented 16 years ago

Logged In: YES user_id=436423 Originator: NO

Done; I found a C- and an O-methyltransferase as well. All new parents:

is_a C-methyltransferase activity GO:0008169 rRNA (cytosine-C5-967)-methyltransferase activity GO:0009383

is_a N-methyltransferase activity GO:0008170 rRNA (adenine-N6,N6-)-dimethyltransferase activity GO:0000179 rRNA (adenine-N6-)-methyltransferase activity GO:0008988 rRNA (guanine-N1-)-methyltransferase activity GO:0008989 rRNA (guanine-N2-)-methyltransferase activity GO:0008990

is_a O-methyltransferase activity GO:0008171 rRNA (adenosine-2'-O-)-methyltransferase activity GO:0030743

m

Original comment by: mah11

gocentral commented 16 years ago

Original comment by: mah11