Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago
and possibly rename GO:0033061 DNA recombinase mediator complex Rad51 recombinase mediator complex
looks like we also need a new term Rad55/rad57 recombination mediator complex synonym Rhp55/Rhp57 recombination mediator complex (I had used GO:0033061 for this by mistake)
Original comment by: ValWood
Original comment by: mah11
Hi,
This is a general comment. Do we want to have gene product names in the GO Term name? Can we name the complex based on its function and mention the subunits from a given species in the definition? Because this is going to be a moving target as gene names change sometimes (often!) and one doesn't know if the gene name is that of fission yeast or budding yeast and so on.
2 cents!
Rama
Original comment by: rbalakri
I personally prefer complxes without product names but in these cases it is how te community refer to them so its difficult to give them another name I would usually call by the S. cerevisiae name if ir exists and give any different pombe names as synonyms. Also if a btter name comes into use later this can be added.
As yet the equivalent complex to this hasn't been identified in S. cerevisiae pombe swi5 is the ortholog of S. cerevisiae SAE3 but we have not yet identified an ortholog of Sfr1
Original comment by: ValWood
correction, yes there is an equivalent complex
S. pombe Sfr1 is S. cerevisiae MEI5
SAE3/MEI5 does form a heterodimer according to your gene pages. Does it have another name in S. cerevisiae?
Original comment by: ValWood
correction, yes there is an equivalent complex
S. pombe Sfr1 is S. cerevisiae MEI5
SAE3/MEI5 does form a heterodimer according to your gene pages. Does it have another name in S. cerevisiae?
Original comment by: ValWood
Swi5-Sfr1 complex could be something like meiosis specific recombinase assembly complex.
The
Rad55/rad57 recombination mediator complex
could be
Rhp51 recombinase assembly complex
I think the Rhp51 is OK here as this is used in every org for this process
I wonder if we defined DNA recombinase mediator complex correctly?
Original comment by: ValWood
Seems like there are a couple lines of thought interspersed in this thread.
Original comment by: eurie
OK, so DNA recombinase mediator complex is referring to "Rhp55-Rhp57 complex" My confusion arose fro m the def
GO:0033061 Name DNA recombinase mediator complex Definition A protein complex containing two or more Rad51 paralogs and promotes nucleoprotein filament formation during homologous recombination.
I think it is misleading to refer to these are 'rad51 paralogs' they are not rad51 paralogs in pombe (except in some organism predating the most recnt common ancestor) but they are all RecA family proteins. Perhaps the def couls be modified to make this clear. Val
Original comment by: ValWood
So ... I should
1) broaden the def of DNA recombinase mediator complex (GO:0033061) so it's not exclusive to Rad51 homologs;
2) add a term for the Swi5-Sfr1 complex, aka Sae3-Mei5 complex, as an is_a child of GO:0033061
...?
If that's correct, no problem. m
Original comment by: mah11
Val, in the beginning (late 1990s - early 2000s), they were all Rad51 homologs/paralogs. But as you state, definitely is no longer the case.
So Midori's plan of action sounds good to me.
Original comment by: eurie
Ok, def adjusted, and the existing Swi5-Sfr1 complex term moved (GO:0032798; also added synonym).
Original comment by: mah11
Original comment by: mah11
Original comment by: mah11
to Swi5-Sfr1 recombinase mediator complex
Reported by: ValWood
Original Ticket: "geneontology/ontology-requests/5718":https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/ontology-requests/5718