Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago
Actually, we have behavior defined so broadly that it doesn't exclude single-celled organisms. We also have 'taxis' is_a 'locomotory behavior' and proks do that. Only about 1/3 of the terms under behavior also have paths to multicellular organism process.
m
Original comment by: mah11
is taxis really locomotory behaviour and not just locomotion?
I didn't check the def but i was pretty certain until today that behaviour was a process that required a nervous system!
Original comment by: ValWood
Taxis is locomotion in response to a stimulus, which is enough for the behavior def we have at the moment!
Original comment by: mah11
I've made a clinic item for behaviour:
http://gocwiki.geneontology.org/index.php/GO\_clinic\_late\_2009
so I'll close this.
Original comment by: jl242
Original comment by: jl242
Original comment by: mah11
Should have parent multicellular organism process? and the behaviour terms which have this direct parent (visual, adult, lavel etc) the paretn can be removed.
Reported by: ValWood
Original Ticket: geneontology/ontology-requests/6530