Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago
Original comment by: smundodi
Logged In: YES user_id=614564
Do we need to change the heavy metal response terms as 'ion' terms as well? eg mercuric ion, chromate ion, iron ion, copper ion, etc.
Original comment by: smundodi
Logged In: YES user_id=561361
I agree with Suparna. Just be consistent to use either the ionic name or the element name. Right now its a mix of both. eg. copper, zinc, mercuric, chromate etc.
You can have the element name on higher node and ionic forms as ISA
Check with the Chemical Ontology files
From Michael:
the CO file is now available by anonymous ftp from seeker.lbl.gov as
/pub/incoming/chemical.ontology.
-Pankaj
Original comment by: jaiswalp
Logged In: YES user_id=561361
Hi Suparna and Others,
Please check the discussion at
http://www.geneontology.org/email/go-arc/go-2002/2283.html
-Pankaj
Original comment by: jaiswalp
Excel spreadsheet with ionic suggestions
Original comment by: girlwithglasses
Logged In: YES user_id=473796
Hi Suparna,
I agree with you on adding "ion" to the term names. I had a look through all the metal terms I could find and have made a list (see the spreadsheet attached) of all the terms that could be changed. I removed all the terms already containing "ion" and then went through the remainder checking for EC/TC numbers - in these cases I thought it would be better not to add "ion" because the term name is a recognized transporter or enzyme name. There are also a couple of terms that I didn't think should be appended with "ion" because they refer to a compound rather than a metal ion (arsenate, chromate).
Have a look and see what you think. Happy reading!
Amelia.
Original comment by: girlwithglasses
Logged In: YES user_id=473796
If there aren't any problems with the proposed term name changes (adding "ion" to metal term names), I will implement them on Tuesday, Feb 18 (unless you would like to do it Suparna!).
Original comment by: girlwithglasses
Logged In: YES user_id=614564
Hi Amelia,
Please go ahead and make those changes. Thanx. I see the other metal ion terms are in today.
Suparna
Original comment by: smundodi
Logged In: YES user_id=473796
I've made the following name changes:
Function ontology GO:0000287: magnesium binding --> magnesium ion binding GO:0005377: intracellular copper transporter --> intracellular copper ion transporter GO:0005381: iron transporter --> iron ion transporter GO:0005382: transmembrane iron permease --> transmembrane iron ion permease GO:0005506: iron binding --> iron ion binding GO:0005507: copper binding --> copper ion binding GO:0008270: zinc binding --> zinc ion binding GO:0015079: potassium transporter --> potassium ion transporter GO:0015080: silver transporter --> silver ion transporter GO:0015081: sodium transporter --> sodium ion transporter GO:0015089: high affinity copper transporter --> high affinity copper ion transporter GO:0015090: low affinity iron transporter --> low affinity iron ion transporter GO:0016151: nickel binding --> nickel ion binding GO:0030145: manganese binding --> manganese ion binding GO:0030151: molybdenum binding --> molybdenum ion binding GO:0045340: mercury binding --> mercury ion binding
Process ontology GO:0006852: mitochondrial sodium/calcium exchange --> mitochondrial sodium/calcium ion exchange GO:0006876: cadmium homeostasis --> cadmium ion homeostasis GO:0006877: cobalt homeostasis --> cobalt ion homeostasis GO:0006878: copper homeostasis --> copper ion homeostasis GO:0006879: iron homeostasis --> iron ion homeostasis GO:0006880: intracellular iron storage --> intracellular iron ion storage GO:0006881: extracellular iron storage --> extracellular iron ion storage GO:0006882: zinc homeostasis --> zinc ion homeostasis GO:0030026: manganese homeostasis --> manganese ion homeostasis GO:0046686: response to cadmium --> response to cadmium ion GO:0046688: response to copper --> response to copper ion GO:0046689: response to mercuric --> response to mercury ion GO:0046690: response to tellurium --> response to tellurium ion
You are now free to rearrange the heavy metals to your heart's content (within reason, obviously!). Set a date for doing it so people can check it and suggest any changes.
Original comment by: girlwithglasses
Latest version as of april 9, 2003
Original comment by: smundodi
Logged In: YES user_id=614564
I am attaching file with the new version of heavy metal rearrangement.
Original comment by: smundodi
April 9, 2003 version in plain text
Original comment by: mah11
Logged In: YES user_id=436423
plain text version of latest suggestions also attached
Original comment by: mah11
Logged In: YES user_id=473796
This has all been done now. The new terms added were:
GO:0010033 SM response to organic substance GO:0010034 SM response to acetate GO:0010035 SM response to inorganic substance GO:0010036 SM response to boron GO:0010037 SM response to carbon dioxide GO:0010038 SM response to metal ion GO:0010039 SM response to iron ion GO:0010040 SM response to iron(II) ion GO:0010041 SM response to iron(III) ion GO:0010042 SM response to manganese ion GO:0010043 SM response to zinc ion GO:0010044 SM response to aluminum ion GO:0010045 SM response to nickel ion GO:0010046 SM response to mycotoxin
Original comment by: girlwithglasses
Original comment by: girlwithglasses
Since all the heavy metals are not toxins(such as Zn, Fe in plant system), we need to rearrange heavy metal terms. Here is the proposal.
Reported by: smundodi
Original Ticket: "geneontology/ontology-requests/576":https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/ontology-requests/576