gocentral
commented
13 years ago For the first one, yes go with the weaker constraint (that's actually a new one - looks like it accidentally got added twice).
Second one, no idea, monotremes definitely aren't placental but not sure about a uterus. It could be that the only_in_taxon NCBITaxon:32525 ! Theria one was supposed to be never_in? Have asked David.
The last one is another new one that got added twice...I'd go with the weaker.
Original comment by: jl242
Tony spotted some redundancies in the taxon constraints file. My inclination is to remove the stronger axiom in all cases but I thought I'd check with folks
[Term] id: GO:0009291 name: unidirectional conjugation relationship: only_in_taxon NCBITaxon:2 ! Bacteria
[Term] id: GO:0009291 name: unidirectional conjugation relationship: only_in_taxon NCBITaxon_Union:0000004 ! Prokaryota
no idea, but my inclination is to go with the second weaker constraint
[Term] id: GO:0001701 name: in utero embryonic development relationship: only_in_taxon NCBITaxon:32525 ! Theria
[Term] id: GO:0001701 name: in utero embryonic development relationship: only_in_taxon NCBITaxon:40674 ! Mammalia
I recall a discussion with Mike L are there any monotremes with a uterus?
[Term] id: GO:0030141 name: secretory granule relationship: never_in_taxon NCBITaxon:4751 ! Fungi
[Term] id: GO:0030141 name: secretory granule relationship: never_in_taxon NCBITaxon:4890 ! Ascomycota
no idea but weaker seems safest
Reported by: cmungall
Original Ticket: geneontology/ontology-requests/7632