Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago
Actually I see, but i am trying to annotate
Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolases.
It isn't clear to me which of these tems I should use. If I used the common partent I would have to use "hydrolase" activity
Original comment by: ValWood
Original comment by: ValWood
aha - EC says ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase = ubiquitin thiolesterase
http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iubmb/enzyme/EC3/0102.html\#15
and GO has the synonym
Original comment by: mah11
but it is also a ubiquitin protease, see abstract PMID: 20838651 so there isn't a term to capture both
Original comment by: ValWood
so do you want a new term, or can you just annotate to both existing terms?
Original comment by: mah11
ideally there would be a single term as its one function, but i already annotated to both so its fine.
If there is any confusion later I can re open.....
Original comment by: ValWood
OK, I'll close this, but reopen if you change your mind
Original comment by: mah11
Original comment by: mah11
Original comment by: mah11
I knoe this has come up before, but after reading the definitions, exact synonyms and comments for ubiquitin thiolesterase activity and ubiquitin-specific protease activity I can't work ot why ubiquitin-specific protease activity is not a child of ubiquitin thiolesterase activity
Reported by: ValWood
Original Ticket: geneontology/ontology-requests/7774