Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago
There's annotations to mosses, Fungi and bacteria, so Metazoa would be too restrictive: I'm not sure this can get a taxon restriction.
Becky
Original comment by: rebeccafoulger
Original comment by: rebeccafoulger
Metazoa = animals, so not-in-metazoa seems like it would work
m
Original comment by: mah11
sorry- yep. Saw the Fungi/Metazoa grouping, rather than just 'Metazoa'.
I'll add in the taxon restriction.
Original comment by: rebeccafoulger
Added: [Term] id: GO:0075259 name: spore-bearing organ development relationship: never_in_taxon NCBITaxon:33208 ! Metazoa
Original comment by: rebeccafoulger
Original comment by: rebeccafoulger
GO:0075259 ! spore-bearing organ development
never_in_taxon metazoa is probably safe - maybe we can make astronger rule though?
Reported by: cmungall
Original Ticket: geneontology/ontology-requests/8105