Closed gocentral closed 9 years ago
Do you mean only_in_metazoa Chris?
I'd say 'only_in_Insecta' was safe.
thanks, Becky
Original comment by: rebeccafoulger
Original comment by: rebeccafoulger
Added: [Term] id: GO:0045498 name: sex comb development relationship: only_in_taxon NCBITaxon:50557 ! Insecta
Original comment by: rebeccafoulger
Original comment by: rebeccafoulger
thanks!
(duh, yes, I actually meant something like never_in_taxon Vertebrata, but this is very conservative, I'm happy with the stronger only_in Insecta)
Original comment by: cmungall
GO:0045498 ! sex comb development
presumably never_in_taxon metazoa is safe?
Reported by: cmungall
Original Ticket: geneontology/ontology-requests/8107