snaphot stats and staging dont match

[pgaudet]

Hi @kltm

While trying to understand changes I see in the snapshot stats, I noticed a discrepancy between snapshot and what I see in AmiGO/AmiGO-staging: for example for human, the stats say that there are 2696 more IPI annotations

CHANGES IN ANNOTATIONS BY MODEL ORGANISM AND EVIDENCE (ALL) THEN QUALIFIER |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- TAXON | ALL | EXP | IDA | IMP | IGI | IPI | IEP | IGC | RCA | IBA | IKR | IC | NAS | ND | TAS | HDA | HEP | HGI | HMP | ISA | ISM | ISO | ISS | IEA | colocalizes_with | contributes_to | not |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   NCBITaxon:9606\|Homo sapiens | 3539 | -15 | 1102 | 145 | 26 | 2696 | -4 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 0 | 11 | 90 | -2 | 246 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 158 | -918 | 0 | -1 | -1 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   ; however when I filter in AmiGO I see 220819 IPIs for human, and 222261 in staging , i.e. a difference of 1442, or about half of what the stats report.   Any explanation for this?

[kltm]

@pgaudet Strictly speaking, the actual difference would be: (313231) https://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/search/annotation?q=*:*&fq=evidence_type:%22IPI%22&sfq=document_category:%22annotation%22 (314790) https://amigo-staging.geneontology.io/amigo/search/annotation?q=*:*&fq=evidence_type:%22IPI%22&sfq=document_category:%22annotation%22 or 1559 annotations overall, and, adding filters, a change of 1442 for just human.

Of that 1320 are related to IntAct.

[kltm]

To clarify: the stats (I believe) are working on 3-letter evidence codes, but AmiGO is going to be more "evidence term"-oriented, out-of-the-box.