Closed cmungall closed 7 years ago
As it stands now, Noctua is unusable as no ontology autocomplete actually returns anything useful. As the servers are responding, the issue would be the load. The loads were successful, so we need to dig into the data.
It may be an issue with loads
This seems fine: http://noctua-amigo.berkeleybop.org/amigo/load_details
However, this is not so good: http://noctua-amigo.berkeleybop.org/amigo/search/ontology
One hypothesis is clobbering, but it should not be possible to clobber a whole ontology, and I believe owltools should load everything together in memory to begin with.
Hmm, http://noctua-amigo.berkeleybop.org/amigo/load_details
has this:
2017-04-10 2017-04-10 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/extensions/go-plus.owl
but this is an incorrect URL (which returns S3 XML which unfortunately the OWLAPI treats as an empty ontology)
I filed this https://github.com/owlcs/owlapi/issues/657
But it may not be directly related. It may be that gave the wrong IRI in go-plus which causes issues with imports
@BarbaraCzub I believe that Noctua autocomplete should now be working as expected and with the expected terms in place (when I tested).
@cmungall For future reference, could you give a little detail about the exact nature of the error?
Thanks Seth!
Just to be clear, I was not reporting an error myself, I was transferring the information from the ontology tracker. I provided all the info I had.
Hi @kltm and @cmungall
Thank you for resolving the autocomplete issue. I have just checked my models and all the terms that were previously displayed as the GO term ID, are now displayed as GO term name. So this fix appears to have worked. Thanks!
Barbara
@dosumis says: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/13150#issuecomment-293315764
@BarbaraCzub says:
https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/13150#issuecomment-293321257
@BarbaraCzub, I don't have sufficient info to replicate this. Can you give more details? Is the problem lag, or that the term does not exist?