Closed cmungall closed 7 years ago
Ticket needs an actionable body.
@kltm @cmungall
As discussed on the annotation call this morning, the two additional Noctua relations to be added to the hardcoded GO relation hierarchy are:
id: RO:0002304 name: causally upstream of, positive effect comment: holds between x and y if and only if x is causally upstream of y and the progression of x increases the frequency, rate or extent of y property_value: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator "cjm" xsd:string is_a: RO:0002411 ! causally upstream of
id: RO:0002305 name: causally upstream of, negative effect comment: holds between x and y if and only if x is causally upstream of y and the progression of x decreases the frequency, rate or extent of y property_value: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator "cjm" xsd:string is_a: RO:0002411 ! causally upstream of
Thank you.
Ideally, we can close these both into one ticket. Is #392 still valid?
OK, let's move over there
IIRC, there was additional work that needed to be done wrt #392, as discussed in https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12811
That's right, the Minerva stuff I did for https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/12811 is all done except for coordinating with @kltm to actually make the database edits, which hasn't actually happened yet.
@balhoff Which database are you referencing here?
The embedded Blazegraph store in the production Minerva instance.
We need to run some SPARQL updates on the content, for which I made a minerva-cli option.
It's slowly coming back to me. You've tested that on the current contents of noctua-models/minerva?
Not recently, this just jogged my memory. I'll retest sometime soon and let you know. But what we will do is:
Ah, that explains a bit why this stalled out.
This ticket seems to be mixing two things:
Can we not just proceed on 1?
OK, I see we have another ticket with the same title. I marked this as a dupe and then closed this. But I think this ticket has morphed into the ticket about rewiring the models? If so we should retitle it.
cc @vanaukenk