Closed danielapoliveira closed 6 years ago
Thanks. Currently not all of OWL is supported.
Regardless of the export format I would recommend either relaxing to a logically equivalent form that is easier to use.
E.g.
C SubClassOf (G and R1 some Y1 and ... Rn some Yn)
<=>
C SubClassOf G
C SubClassOf R1 some Y1
...
C SubClassOf Rn some Yn
(I would also recommend separating the axioms this way in the edit version of the ontology but that's personal preference)
Thank you for the tip. I will look into finding a workaround then.
I converted the EFO ontology from OWL to JSON using obographs but I came across an issue when dealing with the representation of multiple inheritance in this ontology. For example, the class http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/EFO_0005117 has its parents represented as:
However, in the JSON file that obographs produces I can't find reference to these edges anywhere. Is the type of inheritance represented in some way that I'm not finding or is it not being parsed?